The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Since, however, of things unequal, some are commensurate and others
incommensurate, it is evident that these also must be adapted to
divine natures. Hence commensuration must be referred to those Gods,
through whom secondary natures are mingled with those prior to them,
and participate of the whole of more excellent beings. For thus, in
things commensurate, the less is willing to have a common measure
with the greater, the same thing measuring the whole of each. But
incommensuration must be ascribed to those divinities from whom things
subordinate, through the exempt transcendency of more excellent
natures, participate of them in a certain respect, but are incapable
through their subjection of being conjoined with the whole of them.
For the communion proceeding from first to partial and multifarious
natures is incommensurate to the latter. If, indeed, _the equal_ and
_the unequal_ are symbols of the mundane Gods, _the commensurate_
and _the incommensurate_ are here very properly introduced. For in
things incorporeal and immaterial this opposition has no place, all
things being there effable; but where there is a material subject,
and a mixture of form and something formless, there an opposition of
commensuration very properly subsists. Hence, as the mundane Gods are
proximately connective of souls and bodies, form and matter, a division
appears in them, according to _the equal_ and _the unequal_.
CHAPTER XXXV.
After the mundane Gods, the scientific order of discussion requires
that we should consider divine souls, and the triple genera of natures
more excellent than man, viz. angels, dæmons, and heroes. Previous,
however, to this, that I may as much as possible unfold to the reader
the whole of the Platonic theory about the Gods, I shall present him
with a development of the nature of certain other divinities mentioned
by Plato; and which, owing to the loss of the seventh book of Proclus,
and of other theological works of the most genuine Platonists, cannot
at this remote and barren period be scientifically classed.