The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Hence Time is truly, so far as it is considered in itself, immoveable;
but so far as it is in its participants, it is moveable, and subsists
together with them, unfolding itself into them. It is therefore,
eternal, and a monad and center essentially, and according to its own
abiding energy; but it is at the same time, continuous, and number, and
a circle, according to its proceeding and being participated. Hence,
it is a certain proceeding intellect, established indeed in eternity,
and on this account is said to be eternal. For it would not otherwise
contribute to the assimilation of mundane natures to more perfect
paradigms, unless it were itself previously suspended from them. But
it proceeds and abundantly flows into the things which are guarded
by it. Whence I think the chief of theurgists celebrate Time as a
God, as Julian in the seventh of the Zones, and venerate it by those
names, through which it is unfolded in its participants, causing some
things to be older, and others to be younger, and leading all things
in a circle. Time therefore, possessing a certain intellectual nature,
circularly leads according to number, both its other participants
and souls. For Time is eternal, not in essence only, but also in its
inward energy; but so far as it is participated by externals, it is
alone moveable, coextending and harmonizing with them the gift which it
imparts. But every soul is transitively moved, both according to its
inward and external energies, by the latter of which it moves bodies.
And it appears to me that those who thus denominated Time χρονος had
this conception of its nature, and were therefore willing to call it as
it were χορευοντος νους, an intellect moving in measure; but dividing
the words, perhaps for the sake of concealment, they called it χρονος.
Perhaps too, they gave it this appellation because it abides and is at
the same time moved in measure; by one part of itself abiding, and by
the other proceeding with measured motion. By the conjunction therefore
of both these, they signify the wonderful and demiurgic nature of
this God. And it appears, that as the demiurgus being intellectual
began from intellect to adorn the universe, so Time being itself
supermundane, began from soul to impart perfection. For that Time is
not only mundane, but by a much greater priority supermundane, is
evident; since as eternity is to animal itself, the paradigm of the
universe, so is Time to the world, which is animated and illuminated
by intellect, and wholly an image of animal itself, in the same manner
as Time of eternity. And thus much concerning Time, according to its
first subsistence, and considered as a God.