The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
For it is necessary since there are alter-motive natures, that there
should also be that which is immoveable, and that the self-motive
nature should subsist between these. For if every thing alter-motive
is moved in consequence of being moved by another thing, motions will
either be in a circle, or they will proceed to infinity.[212] But
they will neither be in a circle, nor have an infinite progression,
since all beings are bounded by the principle of things and that which
moves is better than that which is moved. Hence there will be something
immoveable which first moves.[213] But if this be the case, it is also
necessary that there should be something which is self-motive. For
if[214] all things should stop, what will that be which is first moved?
It cannot be that which is immoveable;[215] for it is not naturally
adapted to be moved; nor that which is alter-motive; for that is
moved by something else. It remains therefore, that the self-motive
nature is that which is primarily moved. For it is this also which
conjoins alter-motive natures to that which is immoveable, being in
a certain respect a middle, moving and at the same time being moved.
For of these, the immoveable moves only, but the alter-motive is moved
only. Every thing therefore, is either immoveable, or self-motive, or
alter-motive.
COROLLARY.
From these things likewise, it is evident, that of things which are
moved, the self-motive nature is the first; but that of things which
move the immoveable is the first.
PROPOSITION XV.
_Concerning an incorporeal essence, and what the peculiarity of it
is._
Every thing which is converted to itself is incorporeal.
* * * * *
For no body is naturally adapted to revert to itself. For if that
which is converted to any thing is conjoined with that to which it
is converted, it is evident that all the parts of the body which is
converted to itself, will be conjoined with all the parts. For this
it is for a thing to be converted to itself, when both that which is
converted, and that to which it is converted, become one. This however
is impossible in body, and in short, in all partible things. For the
whole of that which is partible is not conjoined with the whole, on
account of the separation of the parts, some of which are situated
differently from others. No body therefore, is naturally adapted to
revert to itself, so as that the whole may be converted to the whole.
Hence if there is any thing which has the power of reverting to itself,
it is incorporeal and impartible.
PROPOSITION XVI.
Every thing which is converted to itself, has an essence separate from
all body.
* * * * *