The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
For the power which is prolific of energy is perfect. For it makes
other things to be perfect through its own energies. That, however,
which is perfective of other things is in a greater degree perfect, as
being more self-perfect. But the power which is indigent of another
that pre-exists in energy, according to which indigence it is something
in capacity, is imperfect. For it is indigent of the perfection which
is in another, in order that by participating of it, it may become
perfect. Hence, such a power as this is of itself imperfect. So that
the power of that which is in energy is perfect, being prolific of
energy. But the power of that which is in capacity is imperfect, and
obtains perfection from the power which is in energy.
PROPOSITION LXXIX.
Every thing which is generated, is generated from a two-fold power.[241]
* * * * *
For it is requisite that the thing generated should possess aptitude
and an imperfect power. And that which makes being in energy[242] that
which the thing generated is in capacity, antecedently comprehends a
perfect power. For all energy proceeds from inherent power. For if that
which makes did not possess power, how could it energize, and produce
something else? And if that which is generated did not possess power
according to aptitude, how could it be generated? For that which makes
or acts, makes or acts in that which is able to suffer, but not in any
casual thing, and which is not naturally adapted to suffer from the
agent.
PROPOSITION LXXX.
Every body is naturally adapted of itself to suffer; but every thing
incorporeal to act. And the former indeed is essentially inefficacious,
but the latter is impassive. That which is incorporeal, however,
suffers through its communion with body; just as bodies are able to act
through the participation of incorporeals.
* * * * *
For body, so far as body, is alone divisible, and through this becomes
passive, being entirely partible, and this to infinity. But that which
is incorporeal, being simple, is impassive. For neither is that which
is impartible, capable of being divided, nor can that be changed in
quality which is not compounded. Either, therefore, nothing will be
effective, or this must be affirmed of an incorporeal nature, since
body, so far as body, does not act, because it is alone liable to be
divided, and to suffer. For every thing which acts has an effective
power; so that body, so far as it is body, will not act, but so far as
it contains in itself a power of acting. Hence, when it acts, it acts
through the participation of power. Moreover, incorporeal natures when
they are inherent in bodies, participate of passions, being divided
together with bodies, and enjoying their partible nature, though
according to their own essence they are impartible.
PROPOSITION LXXXI.