The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Since, however, according to a division of the universe into two parts,
we have distributed allotments into the celestial and sublunary,
there can be no doubt what the former are, and whether they possess
an invariable sameness of subsistence. But the sublunary allotments
are deservedly a subject of admiration, whether they are said to be
perpetual or not. For since all things in generation are continually
changing and flowing, how can the allotments of the providential
rulers of them be said to be perpetual? For things in generation are
not perpetual. But if their allotments are not perpetual, how is it
possible to suppose that divine government can subsist differently at
different times? For an allotment is neither a certain separate energy
of the Gods, so that sublunary natures changing, we might say that
it is exempt and remains immutable, nor is it that which is governed
alone, so that no absurdity would follow from admitting that an
allotment is in a flowing condition, and is conversant with all-various
mutations; but it is a providential inspection, and unrestrained
government of divinity over sublunary concerns. Such being the doubts
with which this subject is attended, the following appears to be the
only solution of the difficulty.
We must say then, that it is not proper to consider all the natures
that are in generation and generation itself, as alone consisting of
things mutable and flowing, but that there is also something immutable
in these, and which is naturally adapted to remain perpetually the
same. For the interval which receives and comprehends in itself all the
parts of the world, and which has an arrangement through all bodies,
is immoveable, lest being moved it should require another place, and
thus should proceed from one receptacle to another ad infinitum. The
etherial vehicles also of divine souls with which they are circularly
invested, and which imitate the lives in the heavens, have a
perpetual essence, and are eternally suspended from these divine souls
themselves, being full of prolific powers, and performing a circular
motion, according to a certain secondary revolution of the celestial
orbs. And in the third place the wholeness (ολοτης) of the elements
has a permanent subsistence, though the parts are all-variously
corrupted. For it is necessary that every form in the universe should
be never failing, in order that the universe may be perfect, and that
being generated from an immoveable cause, it may be immoveable in its
essence. But every wholeness is a form; or rather it is that which it
is said to be through the participation of one all-perfect form.