The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Hence there is one common indivisible bond of them according to
intellectual energies. There is also the same bond between them
according to the common participations of forms, since there is
nothing to intercept them, nor any intervening medium. Indeed, an
immaterial and incorporeal essence, being neither separated by places
nor subjects, nor defined by any divisible circumscriptions of parts,
immediately coalesces in sameness; and the elevation of wholes to _the
one_, and the universal dominion of _the one_, collects the communion
of the mundane Gods with the divinities that presubsist in the
intelligible world.
Farther still, the intellectual conversion of secondary to first
natures, and the gift of the same essence and power from the primary to
the secondary Gods connects their congress into an indissoluble one.
In things of different essences indeed, such as soul and body, and in
things of different species, such as material forms, and those natures
which in any other way are separated from each other, the connascent
union is adventitious, being derived from supernal causes, and lost
in certain definite periods of time. But the higher we ascend, to the
sameness of first causes, both according to form and according to
essence, and the more we raise ourselves from parts to wholes, by so
much the more shall we discover and survey that union which is eternal,
precedaneous and more principal, and which contains about and in itself
difference and multitude.
Since, however, the order of all the Gods consists in union, and the
first and second genera of them, and the multitude which germinates
about them coexist in unity; since also every thing in them is
characterized by _the one_; hence the beginning, middle, and end
of their essence consubsists according to _the one_. It is not
proper, therefore, to enquire whence unity extends to all things in
them; for their very being, whatever it may be, consists in _the
one_. And secondary genera indeed remain with invariable sameness
in _the one_ of the first genera. But the latter impart from
themselves union to the former; while all of them possess in each other
the communion of an indissoluble connexion.
From this cause, therefore, the perfectly incorporeal Gods, are united
to the sensible Gods who are connected with bodies. For the visible
Gods themselves are external to bodies, and on this account are in
the intelligible world. And the intelligible Gods on account of their
infinite union comprehend in themselves the apparent divinities; while
in the mean time both these are established according to a common union
and one energy. In a similar manner, this likewise is the illustrious
prerogative of a deific cause and orderly distribution, that the same
union of all things pervades from on high as far as to the end of the
divine order. And thus much concerning the contact of the sensible with
the intelligible Gods.[70]
CHAPTER V.