The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum — Plato — John Shaqi
The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum
Plato · en
_Gorg._ It appears not.
36. _Socr._ Do you remember that you said a little before that we ought
not to accuse the trainers of youth, nor expel them from cities, if a
pugilist does not make a good use of the pugilistic art, and acts
unjustly? And so, likewise, if a rhetorician make an unjust use of
rhetoric, that we should not accuse the teacher, nor expel him from the
city, but the person who acts unjustly, and does not make a proper use
of rhetoric? Were these things said, or not?
_Gorg._ They were said.
_Socr._ But now this very same rhetorician appears incapable of ever
acting unjustly. Is it not so?
_Gorg._ It appears so.
_Socr._ And it was said, Gorgias, at the commencement of our discussion,
that rhetoric is conversant with words, not those respecting the even
and the odd, but those respecting the just and the unjust. Was it not
so?
37. _Gorg._ It was.
_Socr._ When, therefore, you spoke thus, I supposed that rhetoric could
never be an unjust thing, since it always discourses concerning justice.
But when you said shortly afterwards that a rhetorician might use
rhetoric unjustly, then, wondering, and thinking that the two statements
did not accord, I made that remark, that if you should think it a gain
to be confuted, as I do, it was worth while to continue the discussion,
but if not, to give it up. Afterwards, however, when we were
investigating the matter, you see yourself that it is again allowed to
be impossible for a rhetorician to make an unjust use of rhetoric, and
to be willing to act unjustly. How the case really stands, by the dog,
Gorgias, requires no little discussion to examine it thoroughly.
38. _Pol._ What then, Socrates? Have you really such an opinion of
rhetoric as you now say? or do you not think that Gorgias was ashamed
not to acknowledge that the rhetorician knows what is just, beautiful,
and good, and that, if any one should come to him ignorant of these
things, he himself would teach them? Then perhaps from this admission
some inconsistency in his arguments followed; the very thing which you
love, yourself leading the way to such questions. For who do you think
will deny that he knows what is just, and can teach it to others? To
lead the discussion to such matters is a piece of great rusticity.
_Socr._ Most excellent Polus! we get ourselves friends and sons, for
this express purpose, that when we, through being advanced in years,
fall into error, you that are younger, being with us, may correct our
life both in deeds and words. If, then, Gorgias and I have fallen into
any error in our arguments, do you who are present correct us: you ought
to do so. And I wish that if any of the things that have been granted
appear to you to have been improperly granted, you would retract
whatever you please, only I beg you beware of one thing.
_Pol._ What is that?
39. _Socr._ That you would restrain that prolixity of speech which at
first you attempted to employ.