The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum
Plato · en
Phædrus, whom we have already[105] met with among the followers of the
sophist Hippias, happening to meet with Socrates, tells him that he has
just left the orator Lysias, who had written and recited a speech on the
subject of love, in which he argued that a youth ought rather to shew
favour to one who is not in love than to one who is. Socrates, who
pretends to be very anxious to hear the speech, begs Phædrus to repeat
it from memory as well as he is able, for he cannot doubt but that he
has learnt it by heart, so great is his admiration for its author.
Phædrus affects shyness, though in reality desirous of practising
himself on Socrates: at length, however, Socrates discovers that he has
a copy of it under his cloak, so they proceed on their walk, talking by
the way, till they reach a plane-tree on the banks of the Ilissus,
outside the walls of Athens, under whose ample shade they lie down[106].
-----
Footnote 105:
See the Protagoras, § 17.
Footnote 106:
§ 1-10.
-----
Phædrus reads the speech, which in addition to the faults of obscurity,
inconclusiveness, and tautology, takes a very low and sensual view of
the passion of love[107]. When it is ended, Phædrus asks Socrates what
he thinks of it, and whether it is not a wonderful composition,
especially as to the language. Socrates at first praises it ironically,
but on being pressed by Phædrus points out some of its faults, and says
that even Lysias himself could not be satisfied with it, and that many
others have both spoken and written finer things on the same subject,
with which at that very instant his breast is full. Phædrus catches at
this, and insists on Socrates repeating these fine things, promising
that if he says any thing that excels the speech of Lysias he will erect
his statue in gold in Olympia[108].
-----
Footnote 107:
§ 11-21.
Footnote 108:
§ 22-27.
-----
As it is the present design of Socrates to take the same low view of
love that Lysias had done, he determines to speak with his face covered,
that he may not falter through shame. He begins by a definition of love,
which he represents to be desire hurried on to the pleasure derived from
personal beauty; and then he goes on to shew, with great perspicuity,
how a person under the influence of such a passion must needs be anxious
that the beloved object should not excel himself or be admired by
others. Then with regard to the body, he will wish to make it
effeminate, and be anxious that his beloved should be as much as
possible dependent on him; and at length he will become unfaithful,
forget all his former vows and promises, and leave his favourite
despised and destitute, who will suffer most of all in this, that he has
been debarred from cultivating his soul, than which, he adds, there
neither is nor ever will be any thing more precious in the sight of gods
and men[109].
-----
Footnote 109:
§ 28-40.
-----