The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum
Plato · en
“Consider it also thus, that, when soul and body are together, nature
enjoins the latter to be subservient and obey, the former to rule and
exercise dominion. And in this way, which of the two appears to you to
be like the divine, and which the mortal? Does it not appear to you to
be natural that the divine should rule and command, but the mortal obey
and be subservient?”
“To me it does so.”
“Which then, does the soul resemble?”
“It is clear, Socrates, that the soul resembles the divine, but the
body, the mortal.”
“Consider then, Cebes,” said he, “whether, from all that has been said,
these conclusions follow, that the soul is most like that which is
divine, immortal, intelligent, uniform, indissoluble, and which always
continues in the same state, but that the body on the other hand is most
like that which is human, mortal, unintelligent, multiform, dissoluble,
and which never continues in the same state. Can we say any thing
against this, my dear Cebes, to shew that it is not so?”
“We cannot.”
67. “What then? Since these things are so, does it not appertain to the
body to be quickly dissolved, but to the soul, on the contrary, to be
altogether indissoluble, or nearly so?”
“How not?”
“You perceive, however,” he said, “that when a man dies, the visible
part of him, the body, which is exposed to sight, and which we call a
corpse, to which it appertains to be dissolved, to fall asunder and be
dispersed, does not immediately undergo any of these affections, but
remains for a considerable time, and especially so if any one should die
with his body in full vigour, and at a corresponding age[31]; for when
the body has collapsed and been embalmed, as those that are embalmed in
Egypt, it remains almost entire for an incredible length of time; and
some parts of the body, even though it does decay, such as the bones and
nerves, and every thing of that kind, are nevertheless, as one may say,
immortal. Is it not so?”
-----
Footnote 31:
That is, at a time of life when the body is in full vigour.
-----
“Yes.”
68. “Can the soul, then, which is invisible, and which goes to another
place like itself, excellent, pure, and invisible, and therefore truly
called the invisible world[32], to the presence of a good and wise God,
(whither if God will, my soul also must shortly go,) can this soul of
ours, I ask, being such and of such a nature, when separated from the
body be immediately dispersed and destroyed, as most men assert? Far
from it, my dear Cebes and Simmias. But the case is much rather thus; if
it is separated in a pure state, taking nothing of the body with it, as
not having willingly communicated with it in the present life, but
having shunned it and gathered itself within itself, as constantly
studying this; but this is nothing else than to pursue philosophy
aright, and in reality to study how to die easily; would not this be to
study how to die?”
-----
Footnote 32: