Eloisa : $b or, A series of original letters — Jean-Jacques Rousseau — John Shaqi
Eloisa : $b or, A series of original letters
Jean-Jacques Rousseau · en
On these principles you may reconcile the encomiums I have always
bestowed on true valour, with the contempt I have as constantly
expressed for the base pretenders to magnanimity. I admire men of
spirit, and hate cowards; I would break with a pusillanimous lover,
who should betray the want of a proper resolution in cases of danger,
and think with all the rest of my sex, that the ardours of true
courage heighten those of love. But, I would have such courage exerted
only on lawful occasions, and not an idle parade made of it when it is
unnecessary, as if there was some fear of not having it ready when it
should be called for. There are cowards who will make one effort to
exert their courage, that they may have a pretence to avoid danger the
rest of their lives. True courage is more constant and less impetuous;
it is always what it ought to be, and wants neither the spur nor the
rein; the man of real magnanimity carries it always about him; in
fighting he exerts it against his enemy; in company against
back-biting and falsehood, and on a sick bed against the attacks of
pain and the horrors of death. That fortitude of mind which inspires
true courage is always exerted; it places virtue out of the reach of
events, and does not consist in braving danger, but in not fearing it.
Such, my friend, is the merit of that courage I have often commended,
and which I would admire in you. All other pretences to bravery are
wild, extravagant, and brutal; it is even cowardice to submit to them;
and I despise as much the man who runs himself into needless danger,
as him who turns his back on what he ought to encounter.
If I am not much mistaken, I have now made it clear, that, in this
your quarrel with Lord B----, your own honour is not at all concerned;
that you are going to compromise mine by drawing your sword to avenge
it; that such conduct is neither just, reasonable, nor lawful; that it
by no means agrees with the sentiments you profess, but belongs only
to bad men, who make use of their courage as a supplement to virtues
they do not possess, or to officers that fight not for honour but
interest; that there is more true courage in despising than adopting
it, that the inconveniences to which you expose yourself by rejecting
it are inseparable from the practice of our duty, and are more
apparent than real; in fine, that men who are the most ready to recur
to the sword, are always those of the most suspicious characters. From
all which I conclude, that you cannot either give or accept a
challenge on this occasion, without giving up at once the cause of
reason, virtue, honour, and Eloisa. Canvas my arguments as you please,
heap sophism on sophism, as you will, it will be always found that a
man of true courage is not a coward, and that a man of virtue cannot
be without honour. And I think I have demonstrated as clearly that a
man of true courage despises, and a man of virtue abhors, duelling.