Eloisa : $b or, A series of original letters — Jean-Jacques Rousseau — John Shaqi
Eloisa : $b or, A series of original letters
Jean-Jacques Rousseau · en
You may be easy as to the fear of having offended me. Your letter
rather excited my grief than my anger. It is not me, it is your-self
you have offended, by a debauch in which the heart had no share. I am
at this, however, but the more afflicted; for I had much rather you
should affront Eloisa than debase yourself; and the injury you have
done to yourself is that only which I cannot forgive.----To regard
only the fault of which you accuse yourself, you are not so culpable
as you imagine: I can reproach you on that account only with
imprudence. But what I blame you for, is of a greater moment, and
proceeds from a failing, that has taken deeper root than you imagine,
and which it is the part of a friend to lay before you.
Your primary error lies in having at first taken a wrong path, in
which, the farther you advance the more you will go astray; and I
tremble to see that, unless you tread back the steps you have taken,
you are inevitably lost. You have suffered yourself to be led
insensibly into the very snares I dreaded. The more gross and palpable
allurements of vice I knew could not seduce you, but the bad company
you keep, hath begun by deluding your reason, to corrupt your morals,
and hath already made the first essay of its maxims on your behaviour.
You have told me nothing, it is true, in particular, of the
acquaintance you have made in Paris; but it is easy to judge of your
companions by your letters, and of those who point out the objects, by
your manner of describing them. I have not concealed from you how
little satisfied I have been with your remarks; you have nevertheless
continued them in the same stile, which has only increased my
displeasure. In fact, one would rather take your observations for the
sarcasms of some petit-maitre, than for the animadversions of a
philosopher; and it is hardly possible to believe them written by the
same hand that wrote your former letters. Do you think to study
mankind by the confined behaviour of a few societies of finical prudes
and other idlers? do none of your remarks penetrate beyond the
exterior and changeable varnish which ought hardly to have engaged
your attention? was it worthwhile to collect with so much care those
peculiarities of manners and decorum, which ten years hence will no
longer exist; while the unalterable springs of the human heart, the
constant and secret workings of the passions have escaped your
researches? let us turn to your letter concerning women: in what have
you instructed me to know them? you have given indeed a description of
their dress, which all the world might be as well acquainted with; and
have made some malicious observations on the address and behaviour of
some, as also of the irregularities of a few others, which you have
unjustly attributed to them all, as if no person of virtuous
sentiments was to be found in Paris, and every woman flaunted about
there in her chariot, and sat in the front boxes. Have you told me any