The World as Will and Idea — Schopenhauer — John Shaqi
The World as Will and Idea
Schopenhauer · German
Will is the thing-in-itself, the inner content, the essence of the world.
Life, the visible world, the phenomenon, is only the mirror of the will.
Therefore life accompanies the will as inseparably as the shadow
accompanies the body; and if will exists, so will life, the world, exist.
Life is, therefore, assured to the will to live; and so long as we are
filled with the will to live we need have no fear for our existence, even
in the presence of death. It is true we see the individual come into being
and pass away; but the individual is only phenomenal, exists only for the
knowledge which is bound to the principle of sufficient reason, to the
_principio individuationis_. Certainly, for this kind of knowledge, the
individual receives his life as a gift, rises out of nothing, then suffers
the loss of this gift through death, and returns again to nothing. But we
desire to consider life philosophically, _i.e._, according to its Ideas,
and in this sphere we shall find that neither the will, the
thing-in-itself in all phenomena, nor the subject of knowing, that which
perceives all phenomena, is affected at all by birth or by death. Birth
and death belong merely to the phenomenon of will, thus to life; and it is
essential to this to exhibit itself in individuals which come into being
and pass away, as fleeting phenomena appearing in the form of
time—phenomena of that which in itself knows no time, but must exhibit
itself precisely in the way we have said, in order to objectify its
peculiar nature. Birth and death belong in like manner to life, and hold
the balance as reciprocal conditions of each other, or, if one likes the
expression, as poles of the whole phenomenon of life. The wisest of all
mythologies, the Indian, expresses this by giving to the very god that
symbolises destruction, death (as Brahma, the most sinful and the lowest
god of the Trimurti, symbolises generation, coming into being, and Vishnu
maintaining or preserving), by giving, I say, to Siva as an attribute not
only the necklace of skulls, but also the lingam, the symbol of
generation, which appears here as the counterpart of death, thus
signifying that generation and death are essentially correlatives, which
reciprocally neutralise and annul each other. It was precisely the same
sentiment that led the Greeks and Romans to adorn their costly sarcophagi,
just as we see them now, with feasts, dances, marriages, the chase, fights
of wild beasts, bacchanalians, &c.; thus with representations of the full
ardour of life, which they place before us not only in such revels and
sports, but also in sensual groups, and even go so far as to represent the
sexual intercourse of satyrs and goats. Clearly the aim was to point in
the most impressive manner away from the death of the mourned individual
to the immortal life of nature, and thus to indicate, though without
abstract knowledge, that the whole of nature is the phenomenon and also
the fulfilment of the will to live.