Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden — Voltaire — John Shaqi
Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden
Voltaire · en
In his preface he says of Charles XII: “He has done Actions that
Posterity will have room to Fable upon, till they make his History
Incredible, and turn it into Romance.” The romance is already in
process in Defoe’s pages. The following passage in the text may be
quoted to give an idea of his Scots gentleman’s estimate of the King--
“And such as these were his Discourses to us, who were his Servants,
which so effectually convinc’d us, that his Cause was just, and his
Foundations right, that however black the Prospect was, which we had
before us; for we could see nothing attending us in the Process of the
War, but Death, or being made Prisoners of War, which among Northern
Princes especially, is but one Degree less in its Nature to a Soldier;
and yet it must be said, in Honour of his _Swedish_ Majesty’s
Service, and of his Servants too; that not an Officer of Note deserted
him to the Day of his Death, or quitted his Service, tho’ always
unfortunate; nay, even the foreign Officers did not desert him; for
we all thought, so much Virtue, such personal Bravery, such gallant
Principles, such immoveable Steadiness, could not fail, but _one Time
or other_ must necessarily have a Turn of Fortune in the World, must
_some Time or other_ find Friends to support it: For who could
imagine, that so gallant a Prince should at once be abandon’d of all
the Princes of the Earth, from whom any Assistance could be expected;
and that he, whose Ancestors had been the Refuge and Sanctuary of
all the Protestant Powers and Princes in _Germany_, in their
Distress, should at last receive Help from none of the Successors of
those very Princes, who were establish’d by the Blood and Power of
_Sweden_; nay, to apply it nearer, should at last be driven out of
his Possessions by those very Powers, whose Ancestors ow’d the Being
of their Government, to the Gallantry and Friendship of the King of
_Sweden’s_ Predecessors.”
Other extracts might be made which would show that Defoe was writing at
his utmost stretch of speed when he wrote the “History.” This, too, is
proved by the occasional gaps, dates left blank, and uncorrected errors
of fact, or of the press.
Voltaire’s book, on the other hand, though it repeats some of Defoe’s
errors, is an admirably adroit, and a well-poised and considered
biography: one of the best biographies of great soldiers ever given
to the world. We may conclude, if we will, that Voltaire’s English
experiences in the decisive years of the writing of the book, which
undoubtedly gave a new force and impulse to his genius, helped him
also to his particular mastery in this vein. His tribute to England in
his “Lettres Philosophiques sur les Anglais” is an indirect testimony
to his intellectual expatriation; and with these two books and his
tragedy, “Zaïre,” which followed in 1732, Voltaire may be said to have
attained his brilliant majority.