John Shaqi

The Prohibition on Writing Hadith: A Command to Erase, and a Command to Write

One report has the Prophet say "Do not write from me... let him erase it"; others have him say "Write it for Abu Shah" and permit Abdullah ibn Amr's written sahifa. We open the books on the prohibition, the permission, the classical reconciliations, and the century in which hadith stayed mostly oral. The verdict is yours.

By John Shaqi · July 22, 2026 · 15 min read

The Prohibition on Writing Hadith: A Command to Erase, and a Command to Write

Two Commands That Seem to Point in Opposite Directions

In the collections Muslims regard as the most rigorous, two instructions attributed to the Prophet Muhammad sit side by side, and they seem to pull in opposite directions. In one, he forbids his companions from writing anything he says except the Qur'an, and orders that whatever has already been written be rubbed out. In another, he tells a man from Yemen to "write it," gives a young companion leave to record everything he hears, and — in a saying repeated for centuries — urges believers to "bind knowledge by writing."

Behind these two commands lies a plain historical fact: for roughly the first Islamic century, the sayings of the Prophet were carried mostly in memory, not on paper. The great written collections Muslims rely on today were assembled around two hundred years after his death. This article opens the books on that gap — the report of prohibition, the reports of permission, the reconciliations the classical scholars offered, and the recorded history of when hadith actually came to be written and compiled.

Continue Reading

Continue reading this article

Sign in free to read in full. Become a member to join the discussion without limits.

Sign in free to read →
Reader$0/mo
  • Read every article
  • Comment and reply (up to 100 words, 10/month)
  • Browse the community
  • Reader badge
Join as Reader
Scholar$8/mo
  • Everything in Writer
  • Scholar badge
  • Featured in the community
Join as Scholar