Ikrima, Mawla of Ibn Abbas: Accused of Lying and Kharijism — Bukhari's Trust, Muslim's Avoidance
Ibn Umar warned his own freed slave Nafi': "Do not lie upon me as Ikrima lied upon Ibn Abbas." Yet Bukhari filled his Sahih with Ikrima's narrations, while Muslim allowed him a single supported hadith. The books preserve both the accusations and the defenses — the verdict is yours.
By John Shaqi · July 23, 2026 · 15 min read

The Warning Given to Nafi'
Madinah, in the closing decades of the first Islamic century. Abdullah ibn Umar — son of the second caliph, one of the most careful narrators among the Companions — speaks to Nafi', his own freed slave and student, the man through whom the famous "golden chain" of hadith (Malik, from Nafi', from Ibn Umar) would later pass. What he says is preserved in the biographical dictionaries of hadith criticism, and it is not general advice. It names a man.
That man is Ikrima, the freed slave (mawla) of Abdullah ibn Abbas — the Companion celebrated as the "interpreter of the Qur'an." Open almost any classical tafsir and his name is everywhere: "Ikrima, from Ibn Abbas." Yet the words attributed to Ibn Umar about him, as recorded by al-Mizzi in Tahdhib al-Kamal and al-Dhahabi in Mizan al-I'tidal, are these:
Continue Reading
Continue reading this article
Sign in free to read in full. Become a member to join the discussion without limits.
Sign in free to read →- ✓Read every article
- ✓Comment and reply (up to 100 words, 10/month)
- ✓Browse the community
- ✓Reader badge