A Critique of Socialism: Read Before The Ruskin Club of Oakland California, 1905Sims, George R. (George Robert)
Philosophy
A Critique of Socialism: Read Before The Ruskin Club of Oakland California, 1905
Sims, George R. (George Robert)
Socialism
Now, first, _rent_: I confess that I have no patience with any one who
claims, as an inherent right, the exclusive ownership of any part of the
earth. He might as well claim ownership in a section of air. In this I
am very certain that I have the hearty concurrence of every member of
this Club. I am so sure of this, in fact, that I am going to make
that assumption, in which we all agree, the starting point of a little
dialogue, in which, after the manner of Plato, I will put Socrates at
one end of the discussion, and some of his friends, whom we will suppose
to be Phædo, and Crito, and Simmias, and the rest at the other, and we
will let Socrates and Phædo carry on the conversation, which might run
as follows:
_Socrates_--We are agreed, then, that no man has any right inherent in
himself to the ownership of land.
_Phædo_--Certainly, we agree to that. Such a thing is absurd, for the
earth is a gift to the human race, and not to particular men.
_Socrates_--I am glad that you think so, and am sure we shall continue
to agree. And if no one man has any right to exclusive ownership of
land, neither have any two men, since it is plain that neither could
convey to himself and another any right which he did not possess, nor
could two men together by any means get lawful title to what neither was
entitled to hold.
_Phædo_--You are doubtless right, Socrates. I do not think any man could
dispute that.
_Socrates_--And if neither one man nor two men can acquire lawful title
to land, neither for the same reason could any number, no matter how
great, acquire lawful title.
_Phædo_--That certainly follows from what we have already agreed to.
_Socrates_--And it makes no difference how small or how great a portion
of land may be. No man and no number of men can acquire lawful ownership
of it.
_Phædo_--That is also so plainly true that it seems hardly worth while
to say it. It certainly makes no difference whether the land be a square
furlong or a continent.
_Socrates_--As you say, Phædo, that is very evident. The earth belongs
to mankind, and all men are by nature sharers in its benefits.
_Phædo_--I trust that you will understand that I agree with you in that,
and so make an end of it.
_Socrates_--It is perhaps best that we be very sure that we agree as we
go on, so that if we should at any time disagree, we do not need to go
far back to find where our difference began. The earth is the property
of men in common, and each has an undivided share in its possession.
_Phædo_--That is another thing too plain to be disputed.
_Socrates_--And when men hold property in common, each has as much right
to all parts of it as another.
_Phædo_--To be sure. I do not see why we need waste time in mentioning
things so plain and so trivial.
_Socrates_--And when men own property they may do with it as they
please, and property which men own jointly they may visit and remain
upon, the one as much as the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account