A Guide to the Scientific Knowledge of Things FamiliarBrewer, Ebenezer Cobham
Science
A Guide to the Scientific Knowledge of Things Familiar
Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham
Science -- Juvenile literature
A. Because wood is too _substantial_ to be heated into combustion, by
the flame issuing from a mere _match_.
Q. _Why would not the paper do as well, if placed on the TOP of the
coals?_
A. As every blaze _tends upwards_, if the paper were placed on the _top_
of the fire, its blaze would afford _no contact of flame_ to fuel lying
_below_.
Q. _Why should COAL be placed ABOVE the wood?_
A. As every flame tends _upwards_, if the wood were _above the coal_,
the _flame_ would not rise _through the coal_ to heat it.
Q. _Why is a FIRE KINDLED at the LOWEST BAR of a grate?_
A. As every flame tends _upwards_; when a flame is made at the _bottom_
of a fire, it _ascends through the fuel_ and heats it: whereas, if the
fire were lighted from the _top_, the flame would _not come into
contact_ with the fuel piled below.
Q. _Why does COAL make such EXCELLENT FUEL?_
A. Because it is so very _hard_ and _compact_, that it burns away very
slowly.
Q. _Why will CINDERS become RED HOT, quicker than COALS?_
A. Because they are _more porous_ and _less solid_; and are, therefore,
sooner reduced to a state of combustion.
Q. _Why will not IRON CINDERS burn?_
A. Iron cinders are _cinders saturated with oxygen_; they are unfit for
fuel, because they can imbibe _no more oxygen_, being saturated already.
Q. _Why are CINDERS lighter than COALS?_
A. Because their vapour, gases, and volatile parts, have been driven off
by _previous combustion_.
Q. _Why will not STONES do for fuel, as well as COALS?_
A. Because they contain no _hydrogen_ (or inflammable gas) like coals.
Q. _Why will not WET KINDLING light a fire?_
A. 1st--Because the moisture of the wet kindling prevents the _oxygen of
the air from getting to the fuel_ to form it into carbonic acid gas:
and
2ndly--The heat of the fire is perpetually _drawn off_, by the
conversion of _water_ into _steam_.
Q. _Why does DRY wood burn BETTER than GREEN?_
A. 1st--Because no heat is _carried away_, by the conversion of _water
into steam_: and
2ndly--The pores of dry wood _are filled with air_, which supply the
fire with oxygen.
Q. _Why do TWO pieces of WOOD burn BETTER than ONE?_
A. 1st--Because they help to entangle the _heat of the passing smoke_,
and _throw it on the fuel_: and
2ndly--They help to _entangle the air_ that passes over the fire, and
create a kind of _eddy_ or draught.
Q. _Why does SALT CRACKLE when thrown into a FIRE?_
A. Salt contains _water_; and the _cracking_ of the salt is owing to the
sudden _conversion of the water into steam_.
Q. _Why will not wood or paper burn, if they are steeped in a solution
of POTASH, phosphate of LIME, or AMMONIA (hartshorn)?_
A. Because any "al'kali" (such as potash) will _arrest the hydrogen_ (as
it escapes from the fuel), and prevent its _combination_ with the
_oxygen of air_.
Q. _What is an al'kali?_
A. The con'verse of an _acid_; as _bitter_ is the con'verse of _sweet_,
or _insipid_ the con'verse of _pungent_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account