A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism — John Shaqi
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
We saw that up to the eighteenth century, and indeed nearly up to the
end of its first quarter, German criticism had done very little, and
that it was never to do much in the direction of “correctness.”
Indirectly, however, in the later half of the seventeenth century, when
the _furia_ of the Thirty Years’ War had in a manner sunk to rest,
something was done in the way of preliminary fermentation both by the
late inoculation of Germany with the Euphuist-Marinist-Gongorist
measles, which is there identified chiefly with the names of Lohenstein
and Hoffmanswaldau, and by reaction against this,[14] while something
further has, at least by some, been considered to have been done by
Gottsched himself.
[Sidenote: _Theobald Hoeck._]
The works of this period are not, I believe, very common even in
Germany, but the unwearied intelligence with which the British Museum
has been managed for the last two generations has supplied English
readers with a very fair, though not yet quite satisfying, proportion of
the most important. The earliest of these authors—a predecessor of Opitz
even, who might, and perhaps should, have been mentioned in the last
volume—was Theobald Hoeck, or as he is called on the title-page of his
quaintly-named _Poems_,[15] Othoblad Oeckhe. Hoeck makes the nineteenth
chapter of his “Fair Field of Flowers” an ode of fourteen five-lined
stanzas, _Von Art der Deutschen Poeterey_, which perhaps ranks next to,
and certainly marks the new departure from, the vernacular Meister-song
_Arts_ referred to above.[16] But the style and the gist of the piece
are, I think, fairly enough shown in the following stanza—
“Warumb sollen wir denn unser Teutsche Sprache[n]
In gwisse Form und Gsatz nit auch mögen machen,
Und Deutsches Carmen schreiben,
Die Kunst zu treiben
Bey Mann und Weiben?”
But it is hard for the poet when he has both metre and rhyme to look to—
when
“Mann muss die _Pedes_ gleich so wol scandiren
Den dactylum und auch Spondaeum rieren,”
and at the same time see that his rhymes are proper. The thing is
interesting as exhibiting modern German poetry in the go-cart with
laudable anxiety on the part of the infant to go rightly.
[Sidenote: _Weckherlin and others._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account