lost sight of, especially if they recover. Of the total 117 cases which compose the tables, we find that in no less than 97 were the attacks beneficially influenced by the bromides. In the different cases this improvement varies in degree, but in most of them it is very considerable--for example, Nos. 2, 5, 8, 11, 20, in Table I; Nos. 5, 6, 11, 15, in Table II; Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, in Table III; and all the cases in Table IV. In these and others the attacks, if not actually arrested, were so enormously curtailed, both in number and severity, in comparison to what existed before treatment, as to constitute a most important change in the condition of the patient. In those cases in which improvement was not so well marked, in many it was most decided, and in frequent instances caused life, which had become a burden to the patient and his friends, to be bearable. Of the total number of cases, in 3 the administration of the bromides had no effect whatever in diminishing the attacks, and in 3 others the number of seizures was greater after treatment than before. Whether in these last this circumstance was the result of the drug, or due to some co-incident augmentation of the disease itself, I cannot decide, but am inclined to believe in the latter as the explanation. After a consideration of these facts it is difficult to understand why most physicians look upon epilepsy as an _opprobrium medicinæ_, and of all diseases as one of the least amenable to treatment, and the despair of the therapeutist. For example, Nothnagel, one of the most recent and representative authorities on the subject, in speaking of the treatment of epilepsy, says, "Many remedies and methods of treatment have isolated successes to show, but nothing is to be depended on; nothing can, on a careful discrimination of cases, afford a sure prospect of recovery, or even improvement." Such a statement indicates either an imperfect method of treatment, or that in Germany epilepsy is more intractable than in this country, as a "careful discrimination" of the above cases affords a "sure prospect of improvement" and a reasonable one of recovery. That a critical spirit and healthy scepticism should exist regarding the vague and imperfect accounts of the efficacy of various drugs in disease is, I believe, necessary to arrive at the truth; at the same time, we must not refuse to credit evidence sufficiently based on observation and experiment. The above collection of cases are facts, carefully and laboriously recorded, and not originally intended for the purpose which they at present fulfil. Having been brought up in the belief that epilepsy was one of the most intractable of diseases, no one is more surprised than myself at the readiness with which it responds to treatment. So far, then, from this affection being the despair of the profession, I believe that of all chronic nervous diseases it is the one most amenable to treatment by drugs, resulting, if not in complete cure,