Free verse; Modernism (Literature); Poetry, Modern -- 20th century -- History and criticism
This version shows that Cummings was bound to write the poem as he
did in order to prevent it from becoming what we have made it. To
write a new poem on an old subject like sunset and avoid all the
obvious poetical formulas the poet must write in a new way if he is
to evoke any fresh response in his readers at all. Not only does the
rewritten poem demand much less attention than the first poem; but it
is difficult to feel respect for a poem that is full of reminiscences
not only of Rémy de Gourmont, but of Wordsworth (“To the imaginary
sight”), Milton (in the metrical variations taken from L’Allegro),
Messrs. Belloc and Chesterton (“Where jovial monks ...” etc.) and
Tagore in English translation (“Dragging the waters like a fishing
net”). Stale phrases such as “vesper wind” and “silver seas” have
come to mean so little that they scarcely do their work in the poem.
And yet we shall see that such phrases cannot be avoided if we are
to revise the poem for the plain man. “White foam” is understood
from the sea setting, the movement of the poem, the cold hissing
implied in the sequence of _s_’s. “Vesper wind” is suggested by
_sunset_, _spires_, _monks_, _bells_, _tall
wind_. “Salt air”, as well as resulting from the embrace of “white
foam” and “vesper wind”, is built up from _stinging_, _sea_,
and _wind_. The transformations are fairly obvious in the next
three lines. “Imaginary sight” is necessary to remind the plain reader
that the poem is not to be taken literally, a hint that E. E. Cummings
disdained to give. It should be noticed that “imaginary” is the longest
and slowest word in the poem but adds nothing to the picture; in fact,
makes it less real. The seventh and eighth lines express the connection
between bells and waves that Cummings leaves the reader to deduce, or
not. The ninth line is the expansion of the rose idea demanded by the
context: _Monks_, _spires_, _litanies_ are all bound
up with the Catholic symbolism of the rose; and in rewriting the poem
it is impossible not to develop the literary associations of the rose
as well (wafting, perfumes). The rose-windows of cathedrals are also
obviously suggested. Unfortunately _lewd_, too strong a word
for a formal sunset piece, has to be broken up into _jovial_
and _glutton_, recalling the Christmas-annual type of monk. The
analogy between _great bells_ and _fat monks_ has to be
made definite, thus introducing gratuitous words like _mellow_,
_bell-paunched_, _on their knees_, etc. Instead of taking
advantage of the natural associations in certain highly pictorial
words, we have had to go over much unnecessary ground and ended by
being merely dull and banal. In lengthening the metre in the last
two lines to match the slowing down in the original piece it will
be noticed how many superfluous words and images have had to be
introduced here too. First of all, _slow_ itself, as weakening to
the concentration of the poem as the line “To the imaginary sight”.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account