A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815 — John Shaqi
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
On the 16th of May, we received intelligence of there being 110,000
French troops in our front. On the 1st of June, it was rumoured that
we were to be attacked; Napoleon was to be at Laon on the 6th, and
extraordinary preparations were being made for the conveyance of
troops in carriages from Paris to the frontiers. Intelligence reached
the Duke, on the 10th of the same month, that Napoleon had arrived
at Maubeuge, and was passing along the frontier. On the 12th, it was
ascertained, for certain, that the French army had assembled and was
about to cross the frontiers[7]; but the Duke, for reasons we shall
hereafter give, did not think proper to move his troops until quite
satisfied as to the point where Napoleon would make his attack; that
point proved to be Charleroi, on the high-road to Brussels, on the
left of the allied and right of the Prussian armies, said to be the
most favourable for defeating the two armies, in detail; which I am
inclined to doubt. Situated as the allied and Prussian armies were,
Napoleon, by attempting to wedge his army in between the two, was
pretty certain of having both upon him: he could not aim a blow at
one enemy without being assailed in flank or rear by the other.
Brussels, the capital of Belgium, lies in the very centre of that
country, which was declared by general Gneisenau, chief of the
Prussian staff, to be a formidable bastion, flanking efficaciously
any invasion meditated by France against Germany, and serving at the
same time as a _tête de pont_ to England.
Napoleon had numerous partisans and friends in Belgium, who secretly
espoused his cause, and who, no doubt, would have seconded him in
his attempt to again annex that country to the French Empire. The
people also were by no means reconciled to the union forced upon them
by the congress of Vienna, a union with a country differing from
them in religion and customs; and the dense population and troops of
Belgium might probably have made a movement in favour of the French,
had Napoleon obtained possession of the capital. From the tenor of
Napoleon’s letter to Ney, and his proclamations to his army and to
the Belgians[8], it is quite evident that the Emperor expected a
manifestation of this kind. This would certainly have added to his
cause that moral force of which it stood so much in need, and have
induced thousands to rally round the Imperial eagles.
Brussels was our main line of operations and the line of
communication with Ostend and Antwerp, the dépôts where our
reinforcements and supplies were landed. The Duke, in consequence,
saw clearly, it was of the utmost importance, both in a military and
political point of view, to preserve an uninterrupted communication
with those ports, and that the enemy should not, even for a moment,
obtain possession of Brussels[9].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account