Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism — John Shaqi
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
The Nature God neither sends calamities nor wills them--they are an
inevitable part of the growth and development of things; they are
eddies in the stream of forces. What we call evil is evil only from
our point of view; evil is a human word and not the word of the
Infinite. If the world were something made by a Maker external to
it, then it were pertinent to ask, Why not make it a better world?
Why not leave out pain and sin and all other phases of evil? But
the world is not something made, and it did not have a Maker, as
we use those words. The universe _is_, and always has been, “from
everlasting to everlasting,” and man is a part of it, and his life
is subject to the same vicissitudes as the rest of creation. Man has
come into this sense of right and wrong, of justice and mercy, of
truth and falsehood, of good and evil, as necessary conditions of
his development, but those things are not absolute; they pertain to
him alone. The physical forces break out of their natural bounds
and run riot for a season; the human forces do the same thing and
give rise to various excesses. The crimes and misdemeanors of man
are exceptional as the outbreaks in nature are exceptional. They
relate man to nature and show how the same plan runs through both. A
world with storm and the warring and violence of the elements left
out would be a radically different world--an impossible world. And a
world of man, a Quaker world, is equally impossible.
If some being of infinite wisdom and love had made the world and made
man to live in it, we could ask him some embarrassing questions;
but, let me repeat, the world was not made, it is only a link in a
chain of cosmic events, and it is not for man any more than for any
other creature. Each must “work out his own salvation, with fear and
trembling.”
Introduce design into nature and you humanize it and get into
difficulties at once. It is above design. We have no language in
which to speak the ultimate truth, no language in which to describe
the character and the doings of the Infinite. The ways of the
Infinite are not only past finding out, they are unspeakable by
reason of our finite relations to them. We cannot arraign the Nature
God. It does not design, nor make, nor govern, nor employ means to
ends, as do the man-made gods. It _is_. All things are a part of
its infinite complexity. Nature rests forever in itself. It neither
fails nor succeeds. In itself it is neither good nor evil, neither
divine nor devilish; it is all things to all men, because they are
all things to it. It is neither one nor many; it is the Infinite. In
these vain attempts to define or describe the indefinable I have no
language but that of the finite, no language but that of our limited
or circumscribed relation to the world of concrete and fragmentary
things. Hence I am constantly like the plains ranger caught by his
own lasso, or the angler caught by his own hook.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account