Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
[61] 1409 b, ἡδεῖα δ’ ἡ τοιαύτη καὶ εὐμαθής. The translation of Cope and
of Welldon, “easily learnt” is amiss; and Welldon’s foot-note thereon
about learning speeches by heart is still more misleading. The εὐσύνοπτον
(end of 1409 a), “easily grasped as a whole,” of the preceding sentence
does not imply writing and reading; and there is no other word in the
context even to suggest this except the reference to memory, which in
the classical rhetoric is rarely applied to memorizing. The translation
“easily learnt” is precluded both by the general trend of the passage
and by the specific figures of walking, running, and breathing. Here, as
throughout the _Rhetoric_ and the _Poetic_, Aristotle avoids speaking
of style in the visual terms common to modern generations of writers
and readers. His terms, whether literal or figurative, are generally
auditory and motor. When he uses others, it is to distinguish something
special, as in Chapter xii (below) the exceptional, literary opportunity
of such compositions as those of Isocrates. Not only does his _Rhetoric_
deal primarily and generally with oral composition, but in particular
this section on σύνθεσις (_compositio_) deals with movement almost
exclusively. Not until he has explained the period rhythmically does he
add our modern definition that it should _also_ be concluded with the
sense, i.e., with the syntax. Meantime he finds the period superior to
the loose sentence—for oratory—first because it satisfies the ear by
being heard as a definite rhythm, and secondly because it satisfies the
mind by being intended and apprehended as a definite unit of thought.
[62] 1409 b.
[63] The admirable rendering of Jebb.
[64] 1409 b (toward end).
[65] 1409 b.
[66] For the contrast between the two movements in modern prose, see my
_College Composition_, pages 184-188; for the effect of a passage of
short sentences vs. that of a passage of long sentences, pages 69-71.
Though the sentence unit, in our modern logical sense, is not always
clear from the punctuation of even modern editions of ancient texts, it
will usually be clear from the conclusion of the rhythm. In the earlier
stages of modern prose, on the other hand, it is sometimes so dubious
as to suggest that it was not always felt distinctly. The artistic
development of modern prose, in other words, is partly the progressive
distinction of periods.
[67] Chapter ix, 1410 a.
[68] Chapter x, 1410 b.
[69] 1404 b.
[70] τὰ ἀστεῖα καὶ τὰ εὐδοκιμοῦντα, lively and pleasing, smart and
popular.
[71] Chapter xi, below.
[72] σχῆμα.
[73] ἐνέργεια.
[74] 1411 a.
[75] 1411 b.
[76] ἐνεργοῦντα. Here, perhaps, is the suggestion for Lessing’s famous
doctrine in the _Laokoön_ as to Homeric description.
[77] 1412 a.
[78] 1404 b.
[79] 1406 a.
[80] 1413 b.
[81] Chapter vii, 1408 a.
[82] For this division see Book I, Chapter iii, 1358 b.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account