Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth centuryWiener, Leo
General
Anthology of Russian literature from the earliest period to the present time, volume 1 (of 2) : $b From the tenth century to the close of the eighteenth century
Wiener, Leo
Russia -- Literary collections; Russian literature -- Translations into English
Even under these difficulties, literature and the arts might have
flourished, if Constantinople had been able to give to the new
converts even its degraded Byzantine culture, or if there had not
been other powerful causes that militated against a development from
within. In the west of Europe the Latin language of the Church did not
interfere with an early national literature. Latin was the language
of the learned, whether clerical or lay, and mediated an intellectual
intercourse between the most distant members of the universal faith.
At the same time, the native dialects had received an impulse before
the introduction of Christianity, often under the influence of Rome,
and they were left to shift for themselves and to find their votaries.
The case was quite different in Russia. The Bulgarian language, which
was brought in with the gospel, at once usurped on the native Russian
to the great disadvantage of the latter. Being closely related to the
spoken Russian, Bulgarian was easily acquired by the clergy, but it was
not close enough to become the literary language of the people. On the
one hand, this new gospel language could at best connect Russia with
Byzantium by way of Bulgaria; on the other, Russian was looked down
upon as a rude dialect and was discouraged, together with every symptom
of the popular creation which was looked upon as intimately connected
with ancient paganism.
This Bulgarian language was not long preserved in its purity. Detached
from its native home, it was immediately transformed in pronunciation,
so as to conform to the spoken Russian; thus, for example, it at
once lost its nasals, which were not familiar to the Russian ear. In
the course of time, words and constructions of the people’s language
found their way into the Church-Slavic, as the Bulgarian was then more
properly called. Naturally, many words, referring to abstract ideas and
the Church, passed from the Bulgarian into the spoken tongue. Thus,
the two dialects, one the arbitrary literary language, the other, the
language of every-day life, approached each other more and more. At the
present time, the Russian of literature contains a large proportion of
these Church-Slavic words; the language of the Bible and the liturgy is
the Church-Slavic of the sixteenth century, which differs so much from
the original Bulgarian that, though a Russian reads with comparative
ease this Church-Slavic, he has to study Bulgarian as a German would
study Old German. This Church-Slavic of the Russian redaction has also
been, and still is, in part, the ecclesiastical language of the other
Greek-Catholic countries of the Slavs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account