Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1760-1789; Satire; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
Having thus stated the impracticability of an offensive war in
America, either on the former plan of united force, or on the present
separate efforts, he recurred to the other part of his argument,
whether Administration could pretend to alledge their having adopted
the alternative, and formed even a defensive plan for America and the
West-Indies?⸺If they dared to assume that merit, how could they expect
the House to attend, with any degree of patience, to such a mockery of
all truth? On any rational plan of mere defence, would they not have left
a force at New-York, Rhode-Island, and Halifax, fully able to prevent
any attack in that quarter; at the same time, detaching a sufficient
force to protect the West-India Islands?—Upon such a plan, would not any
spirited Minister have grafted some degree of activity and enterprise?
Would He not have attacked Martinique, Guadaloupe, or St. Domingo? Such
conduct would have struck terror to France, we should have been enriched
by new acquisitions, or, at least, have prevented the disgrace of our own
losses.
But, admitting that this defensive plan may have been but recently
adopted, how are Administration to regain the time they have lost, or
what resources of finance are still unexhausted to prosecute even this
plan? Are all the Country Gentlemen equally disposed to devote fifteen
shillings in the pound to carry on this defensive war? Are they all
equally delighted with the great and growing ruin of an accumulating
debt and a decreasing revenue? Or do they rest their hopes on the wealth
of our East-India trade? Do they know that, there too, the French are
undermining the foundation of our commerce? Or is it studiously concealed
from them, that the French ministry have sent Monsieur Vaugelin to
Canton, in the quality of their Consul at the Chinese Court?⸺He had heard
much of a sudden increase of national wealth by our late captures, but,
at best, the prizes of privateers are a partial benefit; they can enrich
but a few individuals; they afford no diminution of the general burthens
of a whole people. In the present instance, the truth was these boasted
prizes were, in fact, public losses; the French having had the art to
insure their most valuable ships, particularly the Indiamen, by English
policies—besides that, several of the richest captures were actually
freighted with consignments to English merchants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account