Bad Drains; and How to Test Them: With notes on the ventilation of sewers, drains, and sanitary fittings, and the origin and transmission of zymotic diseaseReeves, R. Harris
Science
Bad Drains; and How to Test Them: With notes on the ventilation of sewers, drains, and sanitary fittings, and the origin and transmission of zymotic disease
Reeves, R. Harris
Sewerage
Complaints of the effluvium from these gulleys were made before the year
1830, and are stated to have grown louder and stronger after that date.
Here we have the first experience and results of free and open
ventilation to sewers. As regards the number of these gulleys in
proportion to the sewers we have no evidence in these reports, but
judging from their being specified as large open shafts, the area for
the inlet and outlet of air to the sewers would be if anything greater
than that of the present day. Yet this report states that the ill odours
which escaped from the gulleys, although they might not be pestilential,
became more repulsively offensive, and the attention of the
Commissioners of Sewers was drawn to the evil, and it was felt that some
remedy or palliative ought to be devised.
The means taken to obviate this evil may be termed the first experiment
in sewer ventilation.
“A gulley trap was devised and fixed in the Pavement, Finsbury, in 1834,
and in 1840 nine hundred of the gulleys had been trapped with a view to
remedy the evil, with the following results.
“It became apparent even before that number was fixed, that the sewers
were becoming dangerous to workmen to enter, and the gases generated
found vent by the house drains (then generally untrapped) into
dwellings.”
[It is quite evident that the compression of gases which takes place in
the sewers by the rising and falling of the liquid and sewage flowing in
them was not then known, or this experiment by closing the gulleys and
ventilating the sewers through the house traps would not have been
attempted.
At any rate the first experiment in sewer ventilation in the City cannot
be said to have been a successful one, as it left matters worse than
before.]
“To obviate this, ventilating shafts connecting directly with small iron
gratings in the centre of the carriageways were formed: this mode of
ventilating was also first adopted in the City, and the system of
trapping (with numerous modifications in manner) and ventilating the
sewers in the centre of the carriageways spread through the length of
the metropolis.”
Can it be said that this alteration was an improvement in sewer
ventilation?
The noxious or pestilential vapours that were so repulsive in 1840 when
escaping through the gulleys were not rendered less poisonous by being
given off in the middle of the road or carriageways, but the constant
passing of carriages over the gratings had the effect of mixing the
gases of the sewer more quickly with the atmosphere of the street. Thus
their noxious qualities were not so much observed, but the effect of
these gases on the public health by this arrangement has not been as
satisfactory as many imagine.
When the carriage traffic is suspended during the night, the effluvium
from these gratings is now similar to that experienced from the shoots
or gulley shafts in 1830. This opinion is formed by comparing the report
with testings taken at the gratings last year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account