Biblical Revision, its duties and conditions: A sermon preached in St. Paul's Cathedral at the special evening service, on Sunday, March 13, 1870Alford, Henry
Religion
Biblical Revision, its duties and conditions: A sermon preached in St. Paul's Cathedral at the special evening service, on Sunday, March 13, 1870
Alford, Henry
Bible -- Versions -- Sermons; Bible. Matthew XIII, 52 -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons -- 19th century
But, after all, we are asked, of what character are these blemishes. Do
they, do any of them, affect points of Christian doctrine? Now let it be
observed, my brethren, that this question is in itself a fallacious one.
For what is Christian doctrine? Is it a hard dry tabular statement of
dogmas, to be proved by a certain number of texts? or is it the
conviction of the great truths expressed by those dogmas carried into the
hearts and lives of men? If it be the former, then might we, according
to the objector’s argument, dispense with nine-tenths of Scripture
altogether. If the latter, then we can spare nothing which may make it
clearer or more forcible, better apprehended or more warmly felt. I am
persuaded that no one can estimate the benefit which may be done to the
souls of men by casting light on any one saying of our Blessed Lord,—by
making evident a sentence before obscure in the writings of prophets or
apostles. And that this may be now done, done in very important
instances, done with easy consent and effectually, I am also persuaded.
The great principles of biblical translation have in our time engaged
many able men both here and on the Continent; and to most of the passages
in which our version has gone astray, our chosen revisers would come with
their minds firmly made up, and ready at once to apply the remedy. With
regard to some other blemishes which I ventured to mention, its
application would be easier still. Few would fail to note, or be
desirous to retain, an obsolete word; and in the case of expressions of
the other kind, the only desire would be, while removing the offence, to
leave unimpaired God’s testimony against sin, or whatever might be the
solemn sense of the passage. As regards the last class of blemishes
mentioned, those few which may be due to doctrinal or ecclesiastical
bias, the task might seem likely to be a hard one. But I should be
unwilling hastily to think this. In many such instances, the question,
as it would be raised among our modern scholars, would never enter the
region of opinion at all. It would be simply one of faithful and
consistent rendering, to which the occurrence of the word elsewhere would
furnish an easy and safe guide. I trust it may be said of the Church in
our land, that the longer she lasts, the more she becomes aware of the
futility of forcing into the sacred text any foregone conclusions: the
more she sees the importance of keeping pure from all later alloy the
water which men are to draw from the wells of salvation.
We have thus advanced in our very hasty and incomplete sketch of this
subject, to the last branch of enquiry which we proposed: by whom, and
how, this review of the Church’s stewardship may be carried out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account