Our universities, like most other English institutions, were not
made--they grew; and all we can say of the origin of Cambridge is,
that before the thirteenth century was far advanced references to it
as a "stadium generate" or University creep into the state documents
of the time. A migration from Oxford took place in 1209, and in 1231
a letter from King Henry III to the Mayor and bailiffs makes mention
of a great influx of scholars "both from the regions near home and
from beyond the seas". This document is also interesting as showing
that the finding of lodgings was a matter of no little difficulty to
the scholars. The King has to request the townspeople to deal
properly with the students in all such transactions. When,
therefore, Walter de Merton, the founder of the College in Oxford
which bears his name, bought land at both Universities and endowed
students in those schools, his benefaction came none too soon. His
house and scholars at Cambridge are mentioned in a document as early
as 1259; and it was not till 1274 that he removed these scholars to
the other University. Ten years later was founded the first
exclusively Cambridge College. It was to consist of a Master and
fourteen Fellows, together with a number of "bible clerks"--young men
whose duty it was to read to the Society at meal times. This College
was dedicated to St. Peter, and was known as "the House of the
scholars of St. Peter", or Peterhouse. The founder was Hugh de
Balsham, Bishop of Ely.
The reasons which dictated Merton's change of policy can only be
conjectured. To attempt to set up a stable society in an obviously
unstable community must have seemed to many a risky project. A
university was a body of students who possessed in actual property
little more than the gowns upon their backs. At a word of plague or
rapine they could, and indeed did, migrate elsewhere. A college with
buildings and land could not as easily or as profitably take flight.
From the point of view of a would-be benefactor, Cambridge, standing
as it did "on the edge of the great wild"--to use Mr. J. W. Clark's
words--might well seem to possess a less favourable situation than
Oxford. It had, in the past, suffered a great deal from attack; and
if the educationists of those days thought twice before running the
risk of seeing their good works brought to nought in Cambridge, the
subsequent history of the University very nearly bore out their worst
fears; for the revolting peasants who followed the celebrated Wat
Tyler entered Cambridge in considerable numbers, and, being joined by
the great mass of the townsfolk, broke into Corpus Christi College.
They burnt its archives, together with every other book and paper
they could lay their hands on; and not content with this damage "done
and committed", they repaired to St. Mary's and the Common Schools,
where, seizing the University chests, they destroyed the muniments
and made away with the funds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account