Character of Renaissance Architecture — John Shaqi
Character of Renaissance ArchitectureMoore, Charles Herbert
History
Character of Renaissance Architecture
Moore, Charles Herbert
Architecture, Renaissance
Although this great dome has been almost universally lauded, it is
entirely indefensible from the point of view of sound principles of
construction. The work shows that Michael Angelo was not imbued,
as Bramante had been, with a sense of the essential conditions of
stability in dome building as exemplified in the works of Roman
antiquity. He had conceived an ardent admiration for the dome of
Florence, and in emulation of it he changed the external outline from
the hemispherical to the pointed form, and, lifting it out of the
buttressing drum, set it on the top.[45]
[Illustration:
_A_ FIG. 27. _B_]
This vast dome is an imposing object, but it is nevertheless a monument
of structural error. Not only does its form and construction render it
much less secure than Brunelleschi’s dome, but its supporting drum is
entirely unsuited to its function, save as to its strength to bear
the mere crushing weight of the vault. In replacing the continuous
colonnade, with its abutting load, of Bramante’s drum by the isolated
buttresses, Michael Angelo ignored the true principle of resistance
to the continuous thrusts of a dome. It has been thought that the
rib system justifies this, that the ribs gather the thrusts upon the
buttresses and give the dome a somewhat Gothic character. But this
cannot be so. It is impossible for a dome to have any Gothic character.
In addition to what has been already said (p. 20) on this point, it
may be further remarked that, so long as the surfaces between the ribs
remain straight on plan, as in the dome of Florence, or are segments
of a hemisphere, or of a dome of pointed form on a circular base, like
the dome of St. Peter’s, no ribs can be made to act in a Gothic way.
A circular vault on Gothic principles would necessarily be a celled
vault, more or less like the small vault of the Pazzi already described
(p. 27). In such a vault there would have to be an arch (in a true
Gothic vault a much stilted arch) in the circumference of the drum over
the space between each pair of ribs. The crowns of these arches would
reach to a considerable height, in a developed Gothic vault to nearly
or quite the height of the crown of the vault itself. The triangular
spaces enclosed by these arches and converging ribs would then be
vaulted over by slightly arched courses of masonry running lengthwise
of the triangle, or from the arches to the ribs, and approximately
parallel with the crown of the cell (_A_, Fig. 27). Thus in
place of an unbroken hemispherical or oval vault, we should have one
consisting of deep cells. The drum would have to rise far above the
springing, and the haunches would need to be loaded with a solid
filling of masonry. The vault would thus be completely hidden from view
on the outside. Nothing short of this would produce a circular vault
on Gothic principles, or one in which the ribs could act in a Gothic
way.[46] The nearest approach to such a form, in a vault that may with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account