Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920 — John Shaqi
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
While the returning troop movement was at its height the Transportation
Service was winding up its war business and returning to a permanent
peace footing. This program consisted principally of disposing of
its vessels and its shore establishments. On November 11, 1918, the
Service was operating 580 vessels with a total deadweight of nearly
4,000,000 tons. At the end of 1919 the army fleet consisted of only
the few transports actually owned by the Government through purchase,
construction, or seizure from Germany or Austria.
Most of its vessels the Army held under charter from private owners.
The best interests of the United States required the return of these
ships to their ownership just as soon as the Army could do without
them. The cargo boats were first to go. In February, 1919, the
Transportation Service began turning them back--redelivering them, it
was called--at the rate of three ships a day. In July, when the peak of
the overseas troop movement had passed, the Service began disposing of
its chartered troopships (including the converted cargo transports),
redelivering the last of them in December.
The Government faced tremendous costs in these transactions. The
charters provided that the Army must restore the shipping to its owners
in its original condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Nearly
every ship had been remodeled to a greater or less extent to make it
more serviceable to the Army. All the domestic shipyards and repair
yards were glutted with work, and it was evident that it would be a
long time before the Transportation Service could recondition the
vessels. Meanwhile the Service would have to maintain all of this idle
shipping at a heavy continuing expense.
Instead of reconditioning the ships, therefore, the Transportation
Service adopted the policy of returning vessels as they were, at
the same time compensating the owners with lump-sum settlements for
damage done by war service. In most instances the owners were glad
enough to accept such an arrangement. To protect the Government in the
settlements, joint boards of vessel survey, each consisting of an army,
a navy, and a United States shipping board official, were set up at all
the ports where ships were to be redelivered. Expert marine surveyors
under their direction made detailed examinations of all the ships.
With these surveys in hand, and with the complete history of each ship
and of the service it had undergone while in the War Department’s
possession, the survey boards were able to arrive at a close estimate
of the amount of the Government’s financial liability in each case.
The owners also employed their expert surveyors, and out of the two
examinations grew negotiations which arrived at compromise settlements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account