Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predestForsyth, J. S.
History
Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predest
Forsyth, J. S.
Demonology; Superstition; Witchcraft
Legends, miracles, prophecies, &c. are relics of superstitious ages.
What also is extraordinary, is, that few species of superstition, if
any, originated with the _populace_. They were the inventions of
barbarous ages before the dawn of reason—afterwards the fabrications of
men actuated by ambition, and a desire to servilize the human mind.
As regards the Romans only, a people whom we are taught from our infancy
to respect, and who, indeed, in their better days, were truly venerable
for their virtue and valour, what is there in their history more
astonishing than their implicit belief in augury[1]? Their belief in
omens or preternatural appearances of the heavenly bodies, in eclipses,
comets, and dreadful thunder-storms, may be forgiven. They had made
small progress in astronomy; they had not learnt that an eclipse is a
matter of common calculation; and that storms are, in most cases, highly
beneficial to the earth, and nowise connected with past or future
events. But when we find them giving implicit credit to their priests,
who thought proper to predict good or evil, merely from the appearance
of the entrails of sacrificed animals, from the flight of birds, from
chickens, foxes, &c. we are at a loss to conceive how a deception of
this kind could have prevailed, without being detected and exposed by
the good sense of the people. The mob alone, or the common soldiers and
sailors, were not merely influenced by the reports of the augurs[2];
their kings or commanders undertook no expedition without consulting
these oracles, and were always unsuccessful, if they confided so much in
themselves as to disregard their opinions. In some cases, it is easy to
suppose that they might have been in concert with the augurs, to promote
some favourite point, to raise an enthusiasm in the people in their
favour, or to inspire the soldiers with fortitude in some dangerous
enterprise. But it is not so easy to suppose that this was always the
case, because, upon the evidence of their historians, it appears that
there was generally but little connexion between them; and that,
although the people looked to the commander for _orders_, they regarded
the augurs as superior beings who were to grant _success_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account