Dickens and His Illustrators: Cruikshank, Seymour, Buss, "Phiz," Cattermole, Leech, Doyle, Stanfield, Maclise, Tenniel, Frank Stone, Landseer, Palmer, Topham, Marcus Stone, and Luke Fildes; 2nd. Ed.Kitton, Frederic George
History
Dickens and His Illustrators: Cruikshank, Seymour, Buss, "Phiz," Cattermole, Leech, Doyle, Stanfield, Maclise, Tenniel, Frank Stone, Landseer, Palmer, Topham, Marcus Stone, and Luke Fildes; 2nd. Ed.
Kitton, Frederic George
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870 -- Illustrations; English fiction -- Illustrations; Illustration of books -- Great Britain -- 19th century; Illustration of books, Victorian -- Great Britain; Illustrators -- Great Britain
It has been said that Cruikshank could not draw a pretty woman. At any
rate, he neglected his opportunity in "Oliver Twist," for he fails in so
depicting Rose Maylie, while his portrayal of Nancy is particularly ugly
and repelling, whereas she certainly possessed physical charms not
unfrequently found in women of her class. Although the artist has
imparted too venerable an appearance to the Artful Dodger, he has seized
in a wonderful manner the characteristics of criminal types in his
rendering of Fagin and Bill Sikes. In many of Cruikshank's etchings the
accessories are very _àpropos_, and sometimes not without a touch of
quiet humour. For example, in the plate representing Oliver recovering
from the fever, there is seen over the chimney-piece a picture of the
Good Samaritan, in allusion to Mr. Brownlow's benevolent intentions with
respect to the invalid orphan; while in that depicting Mr. Bumble and
Mrs. Corney taking tea, may be noticed the significant figure of Paul
Pry on the mantelshelf. Some of the designs are marked by slight
incongruities, which, however, do not detract from their interest. In
the etching "Oliver Plucks up a Spirit," it will be observed that the
small round table which the persecuted lad overthrows during his
desperate attack upon Noah Claypole could not possibly assume, by such
accidental means, the inverted position as here shown. In the plate
entitled "The Evidence Destroyed," the lantern (according to the text)
should have been lowered into the dark well, but doubtless the error
was intentional on the part of the artist, in order to secure effect; in
"Mr. Fagin and his Pupil Recovering Nancy," the girl is represented as
being exceedingly robust, whereas she was really "so reduced with
watching and privation as hardly to be recognised as the same Nancy."
Again, in the illustration depicting Sikes attempting to destroy his
dog, we see in the distance the dome of St. Paul's, while, as a matter
of fact, the desperate ruffian had not reached a point so near the
metropolis when he thought of drowning the faithful animal.[2] In "The
Last Chance," where the robber contemplates dropping from the roof of
Fagin's house to escape his pursuers, the rope (described in the
letterpress as being thirty-four feet long) is barely half that length,
and could never have extended to the ground; while the dog, who lay
concealed until his master had tumbled off the parapet, must have been
distinctly visible to all observers if he stood so prominently on the
ridge-tiles as here indicated. The latter etching is one of the most
fascinating of the series, for here Cruikshank has realised every
feature of the dramatic scene,--the harassed expression on the evil face
of the hunted criminal, the squalid tenements half shrouded by
approaching darkness, the excitement of the people crowding the windows
of the opposite houses; indeed, the tragic and repulsive element in the
picture constitutes a remarkable effort on the part of the artist.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account