Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
M. Souday, who recently devoted one of his literary reviews in the
_Temps_ to Dostoevsky, takes a delight in pointing out his mistakes. In
these articles of Dostoevsky’s he sees nothing more than journalism
of the most everyday type, which fact I am prepared to concede. But
I do protest when he goes on to say that these same articles are a
wonderful revelation of Dostoevsky’s ideas. As a matter of fact, the
problems Dostoevsky handles in his _Journal of an Author_ are not
the problems that interest him most. Political questions are frankly
less important in his estimation than social problems, these in turn
far less important than moral and individual problems. The rarest and
deepest truths we can expect from him are psychological, and I add
that in this province the ideas he submits are most often left in the
problematic state, in the form of a question. He is seeking not so much
a solution as an exposition of these very questions which, by reason
of their complexity, confusion, and interdependence, are as a rule
left ill-defined. In a word, Dostoevsky is not, strictly speaking, a
thinker but a novelist. His favourite theories, and all that is subtle
and novel in them, must be sought in the speeches of his characters,
and not always of his most important ones even. It often happens that
his most valuable and daring ideas are attributed to subordinate
characters. Dostoevsky is awkwardness itself when speaking in his own
name. To his own case might well be applied the sentence he puts into
Versilov’s mouth. “Explain?” he said. “No, it’s better not to; besides,
I’ve a passion for talking without explanations. That’s really it. And
there’s another strange thing; if it happens that I try to explain an
idea I believe in, it almost always happens that I cease to believe
what I have explained.”[61]
We can even say that it is exceptional for Dostoevsky not to turn
against his own theory as soon as formulated. It seems as if for him it
immediately breathed an odour of decay, like that which emanated from
Father Zossima’s dead body--the body expected to work miracles--and
made the deathwatch so painful for Alyosha Karamazov, his disciple.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account