Early English Alliterative Poems: in the West-Midland Dialect of the Fourteenth Century
Religion
Early English Alliterative Poems: in the West-Midland Dialect of the Fourteenth Century
English poetry -- Middle English, 1100-1500
[Footnote 46: Such marvels _shall_ happen.]
[Footnote 47:
Wherefore the dark dead sea it is called ever more.
For _its_ deeds of death endure there yet.]
[Footnote 48:
And as it is cursed of kind and _its_ properties also,
The clay that clings thereby are corrosives strong.]
[Footnote 49:
I will speak with the spirit,
And of _its_ woe will I wit (know),
If that I may _its_ bales (grief) abate.]
[Footnote 50: So I got up by break of day and set out; and went
straight till I well nigh came within two miles of the town, when,
as the devil would have it, a horse was standing at an ale-house
door; and my calf (the devil bore out _its_ eyes for me) took the
horse for _its_ mother, and would suck her.]
[Footnote 51: Three specimens of the East-Midland dialect have
come to light since writing the above. Harl. MS. 3909; Troy Book,
ed. Donaldson, E. E. T. Soc.; The Lay-folks Mass-Book, ed.
Simpson, E. E. T. Soc.]
GRAMMATICAL DETAILS.
I. +Nouns.+
(1) _Number._--The plurals generally end in _-es_ (_eȝ_), _-s_. _Yȝen_
(eyes), _trumpen_ (trumpets), are the only plurals in _-en_ that occur
in the poems. In Robson’s Metrical Romances we find _fellun_ (fells,
hills,), _dellun_ (dells), and _eyren_ (eggs), in Liber Cure Cocorum.
The plurals of _brother_, _child_, _cow_, _doȝter_ (daughter), are
_brether_, _childer_, _kuy_, and _deȝter_.
(2) _Gender._--The names of inanimate things are in the neuter gender,
as in modern English. The exceptions are _deep_ (fem.), _gladnes_
(fem.), and _wind_ (masc.).
(3) _Case._--The genitive singular (masc. and fem.) ends in _-es_
(_-eȝ_), _-s_, but occasionally the inflexion is dropped; as, “Baltaȝar
thewes,” the virtues of Balshazzar.[52] If “_honde_ myȝt,” “_honde_
werk,” “_hellen_ wombe,” are not compounds, we have instances of the
final _-e_ (_en_) which formed the genitive case of _feminine_ nouns in
the Southern English of the fourteenth century.
In the phrases “_besten_ blod” (blood of beasts), “_blonkken_ bak” (back
of horses), “_chyldryn_ fader” (father of children), “_nakeryn_ noyse”
(noise of nakers), we have a trace of the genitive plural _-ene_ (A.S.
_-ena_).
[Footnote 52: In the romance of “Syr Gawayn and the Grene Knyȝt”
we find “_blonk_ (horse) sadele,” “_fox_ felle” (skin). In _blonk_
an _e_ has probably been dropped.]
II. +Adjectives.+
(1) _Number._--The final _e_, as a sign of the plural, is very
frequently dropped. _Pover_ (poor), _sturn_ (strong), make the plurals
_poveren_ and _sturnen_. In the phrase, “þo syȝteȝ so _quykeȝ_”[53]
(those sights so living), the _-eȝ_ (= _-es_) is a mark of the plural,
very common in Southern writers of the fourteenth century, and employed
as a plural inflexion of the adjective until a very late period in our
literature.
The Article exhibits the following forms:
SINGULAR. PLURAL.
Masc. Fem.
The. tho.[54] tho.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account