Essays on the Microscope: Containing a Practical Description of the Most Improved Microscopes, a General History of Insects, etc., etc. — John Shaqi
Essays on the Microscope: Containing a Practical Description of the Most Improved Microscopes, a General History of Insects, etc., etc.Adams, George
Science
Essays on the Microscope: Containing a Practical Description of the Most Improved Microscopes, a General History of Insects, etc., etc.
Adams, George
Insects -- Early works to 1800; Microscopy -- Early works to 1800
He had observed, in a letter
of his to the Royal Society, that from upwards of forty years
experience, he found that the most considerable discoveries were to be
made with such glasses, as magnifying but moderately, exhibited the
object with the most perfect brightness and distinctness. Each
instrument was devoted to one or two objects: hence he had always some
hundreds by him.[7] There is some reason for supposing, that Leeuwenhoek
was acquainted with a mode of viewing opake objects, similar to that
invented by Dr. Lieberkühn.[8]
[7] Philosophical Transactions, No. 980, No. 458.
[8] Priestley’s History of Optics, p. 220.
About the year 1665, small glass globules began to be occasionally
applied to the single microscope, instead of convex lenses. By these
globules, an immense magnifying power is obtained. The invention of them
has been generally attributed to M. Hartsoeker; it appears, however, to
me, that we are indebted to the celebrated Dr. Hooke for this discovery;
for he described the manner of making them in the preface to his
“Micrographia,” which was published in the year 1665. Now the first
account we have of any microscopical discovery by M. Hartsoeker, was
that of the spermatic animalculæ, made by him when he was eighteen years
old; which brings us down to the year 1674, long after Dr. Hooke’s
publication.
As these glass globules have been very useful in the hands of
experienced observers, I shall lay before my readers the different modes
which have been described for making them, that the reader may be
enabled thereby to ascertain the reality of the discoveries that have
been said to be made with them.
Take a small rod[9] of the clearest and cleanest glass you can procure,
free, if possible from blebs, veins, or sandy particles; then by melting
it in a lamp with spirit of wine, or the purest and clearest sallad oil,
draw it out into exceeding fine and small threads; take a small piece of
these threads, and melt the end thereof in the same flame, till you
perceive it run into a small drop, or globule, of the desired size; let
this globule cool, then fix it upon a thin plate of brass or silver, so
that the middle of it may be directly over the center of a very small
hole made in this plate, turning it till it is fixed by the
before-mentioned thread of glass. When the plate is properly fixed to
your microscope, and the object adjusted to the focal distance of the
globule, you will perceive the object distinctly and immensely
magnified. “By these means,” says Dr. Hooke, “I have been able to
distinguish the particles of bodies not only a million times smaller
than a visible point, but even to make those visible whereof a million
of millions would hardly make up the bulk of the smallest visible grain
of sand; so prodigiously do these exceeding small globules enlarge our
prospect into the more hidden recesses of nature.”
[9] Lectures and Collections by Dr. Hooke.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account