Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitionsNassau, Robert Hamill
Philosophy
Fetichism in West Africa : $b forty years' observation of native customs and superstitions
Nassau, Robert Hamill
Ethnology -- Africa, West; Fetishism -- Africa, West
During slavery days anything earned by a slave was taken to his master,
who would allow him a share; also, at other times, the master would give
the slave gifts. The slave could do paid labor for foreigners or other
strangers, and was not necessarily punished if he did not share his wages
with the master, but he would at least be rebuked for the omission. Women
ruled their female slaves. For a slave's minor offences, such as stealing,
the master was held responsible; for grave offences, such as murder, the
slave himself was killed.
Certain liberty was allowed a slave; he could attend the village or tribal
palavers and take part in the discussion. If a slave was unjustly treated
by some other person, his owner could call a council and have the matter
talked over, and the slave could be allowed to plead his case.
A slave man could hold property of his own; and if he were a worthy,
sensible person, he could inherit.
In a slave's marriage of a woman the custom of gifts, feasts, and so forth
was the same as for a free man.
If ill treated, he could run away to another tribe (not to any one of his
own tribe), and would there be harbored, but still as a slave, and would
not be given up to his former owner. A slave could become free only by his
master setting him free; he could not redeem himself.
VI. KINGSHIP.
Kingship has connected with it the great honor that a son may inherit it
if he is the right kind of man; but it is possible for him to be set aside
and another chosen. A son may lose his place by foolishness and
incompetency.
Attempts to rule independently of the king are sometimes made by cliques
composed of three or four young persons of the same age, who make laws or
customs peculiar to themselves. There is no national recognition of them,
nor are they given any special privilege.
Kings have very little power over the fines or property of others. These
are held, each man for himself; nor have they the right of taxation; but
they have power to declare war, acting in concert with their people in
declaring it and waging it. They administer justice as magistrates, decide
palavers according to the unwritten law of custom, summon offenders, and
inflict the punishment due.
Their dwellings differ but little from those of other persons of like
wealth and personal ability.
When a palaver is called, the king sits as ruler of the meeting and does
most of the talking. He provides food for those who come from a distance.
A king may be blamed if a war he has declared ends disastrously. While a
king's son expects to inherit the title and power, there is no invariable
rule of succession; he cannot take the position by force. He must be
chosen; but the choice is limited to the members of one family, in which
it is hereditary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account