Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
_Dunsford_. Talking of representation, what do you two, who have now
seen something of the world, think about representative government?
_Ellesmere_. Dunsford plumps down upon us sometimes with awful
questions: what do you think of all philosophy? or what is your opinion
of life in general? Could not you throw in a few small questions of that
kind, together with your representative one, and we might try to answer
them all at once. Dunsford is only laughing at us, Milverton.
_Milverton_. No, I know what was in Dunsford’s mind when he asked that
question. He has had his doubts and misgivings, when he has been reading
a six nights’ debate (for the people in the country I daresay do read
those things), whether representative government is the most complete
device the human mind could suggest for getting at wise rulers.
_Ellesmere_. It is a doubt which has crossed my mind.
_Milverton_. And mine; but the doubt, if it has ever been more than mere
petulance, has not had much practical weight with me. Look how the
business of the world is managed. There are a few people who think out
things, and a few who execute. The former are not to be secured by any
device. They are gifts. The latter may be well chosen, have often been
well chosen, under other forms of government than the representative one.
I believe that the favourites of kings have been a superior race of men.
Even a fool does not choose a fool for a favourite. He knows better than
that: he must have something to lean against. But between the thinkers
and the doers (if, indeed, we ought to make such a distinction), _what a
number of useful links there are in a representative government_ on
account of the much larger number of people admitted into some share of
government. What general cultivation must come from that, and what
security! Of course, everything has its wrong side; and from this number
of people let in there comes declamation and claptrap and mob-service,
which is much the same thing as courtiership was in other times. But
then, to make the comparison a fair one, you must take the wrong side of
any other form of government that has been devised.
_Dunsford_. Well, but so much power centring in the lower house of
Parliament, and the getting into Parliament being a thing which is not
very inviting to the kind of people one would most like to see there, do
you not think that the ablest men are kept away?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account