Gutenberg, and the Art of PrintingPearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
History
Gutenberg, and the Art of Printing
Pearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
Gutenberg, Johann, 1397?-1468
Richard de Bury, Bishop of Durham, in his “Philobiblion,” a treatise
on the love of books, written by him in Latin in 1344, gives a good
picture of the transcriber, or copyist of the monastery. He says: “As
it is necessary for a State to provide military arms, and prepare
plentiful stores of provisions for soldiers who are about to fight, so
it is evidently worth the labor of the Church to fortify itself against
the attacks of pagans and heretics with a multitude of sound books.
But, because everything that is of use to mortals decays through lapse
of time, it is necessary for volumes corroded by age to be restored
by new successors, that books may not cease to exist. Hence it is
that Ecclesiastes truly says, in the 12th chapter, ‘There is no end
of making many books.’ For, as the bodies of books decay, so a remedy
is found out by the prudence of clerks, by which a holy book paying
the debt of nature [_i. e._, dying] may have one succeed it, and a
seed may be raised up like to the most holy deceased, and that saying
of Ecclesiastes, chapter thirtieth, be verified: ‘The father is dead,
and as it were not dead, for he hath left behind him a son like unto
himself.’”
Then he goes on to upbraid the priests for soiling books, giving us
rather an unfavorable impression concerning the habits of the monks.
One would suppose that they could command the leisure to keep clean.
The Bishop just quoted deplores “the unwashed hands, the dirty nails,
the greasy elbows leaning upon the volume, the munching of fruit and
cheese over the open leaves, which were the marks of careless and idle
readers,” and suggestive also, some would say, of lack of culture and
refinement, and even that their religion was of a low type; else would
it not, at least, have produced the virtue which is next to godliness?
Then follow sound and sensible directions how to use books. “Let there
be a mature decorum in opening and closing of volumes, that they may
neither be unclasped with precipitous haste, nor thrown aside after use
without being duly closed.”
Says an English writer: “When a volume was at last produced in fair
parchment, or vellum, after the arduous labor of years, it was covered
with immensely thick lids of wood and leather, studded with large
nails, and curiously clasped, and was studiously preserved from the
common gaze on the shelves of the monastic library.
“The splendid volumes thus made, bore evidence, however, not only
of persevering industry, but of great ingenuity; the letters at the
beginning of each chapter or section being adorned with curious
devices. Frequently, too, a painting called an illumination was
introduced radiant with gold, crimson, and azure. But no vulgar or
unpriestly eyes looked on their contents, unless, indeed, we except
kings and princes; they were only unclasped on days of solemnity, by
the abbot or the prior, and then restored, like the jewels of the
priesthood, to their dusty cases.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account