History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3) — John Shaqi
History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)Taine, Hippolyte
History
History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)
Taine, Hippolyte
English literature -- History and criticism
After all, is there anything in the lines just quoted but decoration?
Translate them literally into prose, and of all those beauties there
remains not one. If the reader dissects Pope's arguments, he will hardly
be moved by them; he would instinctively think of Pascal's "Pensées,"
and remark upon the astonishing difference between a versifier and a
man. A good epitome, a good bit of style, well worked out, well written,
he would say, and nothing further. Clearly the beauty of the verses
arose from the difficulty overcome, the well-chosen sounds, the
symmetrical rhythms; this was all, and it was not much. A great writer
is a man who, having passions, knows his dictionary and his grammar;
Pope thoroughly knew his dictionary and his grammar, but stopped there.
People will say that this merit is small, and that I do not inspire them
with a desire to read Pope's verses. True; at least I do not counsel
them to read many. I would add, however, by way of excuse, that there is
a kind in which he succeeds, that his descriptive and oratorical talents
find in portraiture matter which suits them, and that in this he
frequently approaches La Bruyère; that several of his portraits, those
of Addison, Lord Hervey, Lord Wharton, the Duchess of Marlborough, are
medals worthy of finding a place in the cabinets of the curious, and of
remaining in the archives of the human race; that when he chisels one of
these heads, the comprehensive images, the unlooked-for connections of
words, the sustained and multiplied contrasts, the perpetual and
extraordinary conciseness, the incessant and increasing impulse of all
the strokes of eloquence brought to bear upon the same spot, stamp upon
the memory an impress which we never forget. It is better to repudiate
these partial apologies, and frankly to avow that, on the whole, this
great poet, the glory of his age, is wearisome--wearisome to us. "A
woman of forty," says Stendhal, "is only beautiful to those who have
loved her in their youth." The poor muse in question is not forty years
old for us; she is a hundred and forty. Let us remember, when we wish to
judge her fairly, the time when we made French verses like our Latin
verse. Taste became transformed an age ago, for the human mind has
wheeled round; with the prospect the perspective has changed; we must
take this change of place into account. Nowadays we demand new ideas and
bare sentiments; we care no longer for the clothing, we want the thing.
Exordiums, transitions, peculiarities of style, elegances of expression,
the whole literary wardrobe, is sent to the old-clothes shop; we only
keep what is indispensable; we trouble ourselves no more about
adornment, but about truth. The men of the preceding century were quite
different. This was seen when Pope translated the Iliad; it was the
Iliad written in the style of the "Henriade": by virtue of this travesty
the public admired it. They would not have admired it in the simple
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account