History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
In closing your calculation of numbers you exultingly observe that it
is the first time you ever heard of a general’s being censured for
keeping one-third of his force in reserve and _beating the enemy with
the other two_. Aye—but this involves the very pith of the question.
At Albuera the _general_ did not beat the enemy. My lord, you have
bestowed great pains on your argument about the battle of Albuera,
and far be it from me to endeavour to deprive you of any addition to
your reputation which you may thus obtain. I have no desire to rob
you of any well-earned laurels, my observations were directed against
what appeared to me your bad generalship; if I have not succeeded in
pointing that out to the satisfaction of the public I have nothing
further to offer in fairness and certainly will not by any vile
sophistry endeavour to damage your fame. But do not think that I
acknowledge the force of your present arguments. If I do not take the
trouble to dissect them for reasons before mentioned, be assured it
is not from any want of points to fasten upon; indeed, my lord, your
book is very weak, there are many failures in it, and a few more I
will touch upon that you may estimate my forbearance at its proper
value. I will begin with your observations on captain Gregory’s
testimony, not in defence of that gentleman’s credit, for in truth,
as his and the other officers’ evidence is given to facts of which
they were personally cognizant I cannot pay the slightest regard to
your confused arguments in opposition to their honour. I am aware
that you do not mean to impeach anything but their memory; but if I
were to attempt to defend them from your observations it would appear
as if I thought otherwise. My lord, you have missed captain Gregory,
but you have hit yourself very hard.
Behold the proof.
At page 167 you say, “I will now point out the gross and palpable
errors of captain Gregory’s narrative.”—“He says, that on receiving
the intelligence from an orderly of the thirteenth dragoons who came
in from a picquet on the right with intelligence that the enemy was
crossing the river, general Long galloped off.” I conclude to the
right, “and found half the army across,” and to the right. _Why,
every other authority has stated that the enemy’s first movement was
from the wood along the right bank of the Albuera upon our left_;
and that we were not at all aware of their intention to cross above
our right and there make an attack, till after their first movement
was considerably advanced and the action had actually commenced with
Godinot’s corps on the opposite side of the river to our left. It
is quite surprising that colonel Napier should have overlooked a
blunder so gross as to destroy the value of the whole of his friend’s
testimony.
Now, my lord, compare the passage marked by italics (pardon me the
italics) in the above, with the following extract from your own
despatch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account