History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
History
History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.
Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
Water-supply -- History; Water-supply -- Ohio -- Hamilton County
They consider reasonably safe water, when it is derived from deep
wells, (say 100 feet,) or from deep-seated springs, although it
contains previous animal sewage, but does not exceed 10,000 parts
in 100,000 parts of water. Suspicious or doubtful water is, first,
river or flowing water which exhibits any proportion, however small,
of previous sewage; and, second, well or spring water containing
10,000 to 20,000 parts. Dangerous water is, first, river or flowing
water which exhibits more than 20,000 parts of previous animal
contamination; second, river or flow water containing less than
20,000 parts of previous contamination, coming from sewage discharged
into it directly, or mingling with it as surface drainage; third,
well or deep-seated springs containing more than 20,000 parts,
because previous contamination is in direct proportion to the amount
of such contamination.
The value of an analysis, sanitarily considered, is questioned. Mr.
Simon, medical officer of Her Majesty’s Privy Council, testified,
before the Royal Commission on Water Supply, on this point, as
follows:
“There are dangerous qualities of water supply with regard to
which, so far as I know, chemists are totally unable to measure,
even to demonstrate the fatal influences that a water may have.
A water may be, for instance, capable of spreading the cholera,
but chemists be unable to identify the particular contamination
which produces that effect. It is, I think, a matter of absolute
demonstration that, in the old epidemics, when the south side of
London suffered so dreadfully from cholera, the great cause of the
immense mortality there was a badness of the water supply then
distributed in those districts of London.”
Prof. Frankland says:
“That we have no reason to believe that the injurious character of
either sewage or of the gases from a drain depends fundamentally
upon the quality of that sewage or of that gas. In all probability
it far more depends upon the quality of the sewage, namely, what
it consists of. Now, what is the nature of the poisonous matter
in the atmosphere or in the sewage? We do not know that, at all;
therefore you can not possibly say when that poisonous matter is
got rid of from the water or from the air. Chemical analysis can
not do it, for its limit is by the power of weighing and measuring.
It is not sufficiently advanced, and is one of the poorest things
possible to reach those delicate points.”
Vital statistics are sources of reliable information; and from them
we can learn more of the propagation or dissemination of certain
diseases through the water supply, and the relation of water to
health. The cholera epidemics of Great Britain exhibit striking
examples.
The following are tabulations from the Rivers Pollution Commission
Report, 1874:
LONDON.
YEAR. CHARACTER OF WATER. MORTALITY. RATE PER 10,000.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account