Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna — John Shaqi
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
Before undertaking this, however, I should like to invite you to follow
up another clue with me. It often happens that a poet makes use of a
slip of the tongue or some other error as a means of artistic
expression. This fact in itself proves that he thinks the error, for
instance, a slip of the tongue, has a meaning; for he constructs it
intentionally. It could hardly happen that a poet accidentally made a
slip of the pen and then allowed his slip of the pen to stand as a slip
of the tongue of the character. He wishes to reveal something by means
of the slip and we may well enquire what that may be—whether perhaps he
wishes to indicate that the person in question is distracted or
overtired, or is expecting a headache. Of course we should not
exaggerate the importance of it if poets do make use of slips to express
their meaning. Slips might be in reality without meaning, accidents in
the mental world, or only occasionally have a meaning, and poets would
still be entitled to refine them by infusing sense into them for their
own purposes. However, it would not be surprising if more were to be
learned from poets about slips of the tongue than from philologists and
psychiatrists.
There is an example of a slip of this kind in Schiller’s _Wallenstein_
(Piccolomini, Act I, Scene 5). In the foregoing scene, young Max
Piccolomini had taken up Duke Wallenstein’s cause ardently, and had been
passionately describing the blessings of peace, which he had become
aware of in the course of a journey accompanying Wallenstein’s beautiful
daughter to the camp. As he leaves the stage, his father (Octavio) and
the courtier Questenberg are plunged in consternation. The fifth scene
continues:—
QUESTENBERG. Alas! and stands it so?
Friend, do we let him go
In this delusion? let him go from us?
Not call him back at once, not
Open his eyes here and now?
OCTAVIO (_recovering himself out of deep thought_).
He has now opened _mine_
And I see more than pleases me.
QUESTENBERG. What is it?
OCTAVIO. A curse upon this journey!
QUESTENBERG. But why so? What is it?
OCTAVIO. Come, come, friend! I must up
And follow the ill-omened clue at once
And see with mine own eyes—come with me now!
QUESTENBERG. What now? Where go you then?
OCTAVIO (_hastily_). _To her, herself!_
QUESTENBERG. _To_ ...
OCTAVIO (_corrects himself_). To the Duke! Come, let us go!
Octavio meant to say: “To him, to the Duke,” but his tongue slips and he
betrays (to us, at least) by the words “_to her_” that he has clearly
recognized the influence at work behind the famous young warrior’s
rhapsodies in favour of peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account