Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
The forgetting of resolutions can in general be referred to an opposing
current of feeling which is against carrying out the intention. It is
not only we psycho-analysts who hold this view, however; it is the
ordinary attitude of everyone in their daily affairs, which they only
deny in theory. The protégé whose patron apologizes for having forgotten
his request is not pacified by such an apology. He thinks immediately:
“It’s evidently nothing to him; he promised, but he doesn’t mean to do
it.” Forgetting is therefore criticized even in life, in certain
connections, and the difference between the popular and the
psycho-analytic conception of these errors seems to be dispelled.
Imagine a hostess receiving a guest with the words: “What, is it to-day
you were coming? I quite forgot that I had asked you for to-day”; or a
young man confessing to his beloved that he had forgotten all about the
appointment they had arranged on the last occasion. He will never admit
it; he will rather invent on the spur of the moment the most wildly
improbable hindrances which prevented his coming and made it impossible
for him to communicate with her from that day to this. We all know that
in military service the excuse of having forgotten is worthless and
saves no one from punishment; the system is recognized as justifiable.
Here everyone is suddenly agreed that a certain mistake has a meaning
and what that meaning is. Why are they not consistent enough to extend
their insight to other errors and then openly acknowledge it? There is
naturally also an answer to this.
If the meaning of forgetting resolutions is so little open to doubt in
the minds of people in general you will be the less surprised to find
that writers employ such mistakes in a similar sense. Those of you who
have seen or read Shaw’s _Cæsar and Cleopatra_ will recall that Cæsar,
when departing in the last scene, is pursued by the feeling that there
was something else he intended to do which he had now forgotten. At last
it turns out what it is: to say farewell to Cleopatra. By this small
device the author attempts to ascribe to the great Cæsar a feeling of
superiority which he did not possess and to which he did not at all
aspire. You can learn from historical sources that Cæsar arranged for
Cleopatra to follow him to Rome and that she was living there with her
little Cæsarion when Cæsar was murdered, whereupon she fled the city.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account