Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation — John Shaqi
Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretationCabell, James Branch
General
Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation
Cabell, James Branch
Hergesheimer, Joseph, 1880-1954 -- Criticism and interpretation
Meanwhile she has her loveliness, not of character or mind, but a loan
of surpassing physical beauty. And to Linda Condon her own bright
moving carcass becomes a thing to be tended and preserved religiously,
because beauty is divine, and she herself is estimable, if at all,
as the fane which beauty briefly inhabits.... And by and by, under
time’s handling, her comeliness is shriveled, and her lovers are
turned to valueless dust: but first, has Linda’s lost young beauty
been the buried sculptor’s inspiration, and it has been perpetuated in
everlasting bronze. The perfection of Linda Condon’s youth is never
to perish, and is not ever to be dulled by old age or corrupted in
death. She comprehends this as she passes out of the story, a faded,
desolate and insignificant bit of rubbish, contented to know that
the one thing which really meant much to her is, as if by a miracle,
preserved inviolate. The statue remains, the immutable child of Linda’s
comeliness and Pleydon’s genius, the deathless offspring of transitory
things.
Beauty is divine; a power superior and even elfinly inimical to
all human moralities and rules of thumb, and a divinity which must
unflinchingly be served: that, in this book as always, is Mr.
Hergesheimer’s text. For this is the divinity which he, too, serves
unflinchingly, with strangely cadenced evocations, in striving to write
perfectly of beautiful happenings.
It is an ideal here approached even more nobly than in the preceding
Hergesheimer books. Nowhere has Joseph Hergesheimer found an arena more
nicely suited to the exercise of his most exquisite powers than in this
modern tale of _domnei_,—of the worship of woman’s beauty as, upon the
whole, Heaven’s finest sample of artistic self-expression, and as, in
consequence, the most adequate revelation of God; and as such a symbol,
therefore, a thing to be revered above all else that visibly exists,
even by its temporary possessor. That last is Mr. Hergesheimer’s
especial refinement upon a tenet sufficiently venerable to have been
nodded over by Troy’s gray-bearded councillors when Helen’s skirts were
rustling by,—and a refinement, too, which would have been repudiated
by Helen herself, who, if one may trust to Euripides’ report of her
sentiments, was inclined less elevatedly to regard her own personal
appearance, as a disaster-provoking nuisance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account