King Alfred's Old English Version of St. Augustine's Soliloquies: Turned into Modern EnglishAugustine, of Hippo, Saint
ReligionChristian
King Alfred's Old English Version of St. Augustine's Soliloquies: Turned into Modern English
Augustine, of Hippo, Saint
Knowledge, Theory of (Religion) -- Early works to 1800
_R._ _What spake God then more often, or what said He more truly through
His Prophets to His people than about the immortality of souls? Or what
spake the Apostles and all the holy Fathers more truly if not about the
eternity of souls and about their immortality? Or what meant Christ,
when He said in His Gospel: 'The unrighteous shall go into eternal
torments, and the righteous into eternal life'? Now thou hearest what
said Christ and His Apostles; and I heard before that thou didst doubt
nothing of the word of Honorius and his servants. Why doubtest thou,
then, about the words of Christ, the Son of God, and those of the
Apostles, which they themselves uttered? They spake to us more of such
like words than we can count, and with many examples and proofs they
explained it to us. Why canst thou, then, not believe them all, and why
saidst thou before that thou wert their man?_
_A._ _So I say still, and say that I believe them, and also know exactly
that it is all true that God either through Himself or through them
said; for there are more of these occurrences in the holy books than I
can ever count. Therefore I am now ashamed that I ever doubted about it,
and I confess that I am rightly convinced, and I shall always be much
happier when thou dost convince me of such things than I ever was when I
convinced another man. All this I knew, however, before; but I forgot
it, as I fear also that I shall this. I know also that I had so clean
forgotten it that I should never have remembered it again, if thou hadst
not cited me clearer examples, both about my lord and about many
parables._
_R._ _I wonder why thou couldst ever suppose that men's souls were not
eternal, for thou clearly enough knewest that they are the highest and
the most blessed of the creatures of God; and thou knowest also clearly
enough that He alloweth no creature entirely to pass away so that it
cometh to naught--not even the most unworthy of all. But He beautifieth
and adorneth all creatures, and again taketh away their beauty and
adornments, and yet again reneweth them. They all so change, however,
that they pass away, and suddenly come again and return to that same
beauty and to the same winsomeness for the children of men, in which
they were before Adam sinned. Now thou canst perceive that no creature
so fully passeth away that it cometh not again, nor so fully perisheth
that it doth not become something. Now that the weakest creatures do not
pass away entirely, why then supposest thou that the most blessed
creature should entirely depart?_
[Sidenote: 62.30--63.34]
_A._ _Alas! I am beset with wretched forgetfulness, so that I can not
remember it as well as before. Methinks now that thou hadst explained it
to me clearly enough by this one example, though thou hadst said nothing
more._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account