King Arthur in history and legendJones, William Lewis
History
King Arthur in history and legend
Jones, William Lewis
Arthur, King; Arthurian romances -- History and criticism
wicked king of the Summer Country,” or Somerset. After long seeking
for a convenient opportunity, Melwas carries her violently away to
Glastonia, or Glastonbury, a place chosen by him as being apparently
impregnable because of the marshes around it. Arthur, discovering her
retreat, besieges Glastonbury with a large army drawn from Cornwall
and Devon. Before, however, he and Melwas engage in battle, the monks
of the abbey, accompanied by Gildas, intervene; peace is made, and the
queen is restored to her lawful husband.
Of the many chroniclers who, either in prose or in verse, repeat and
embellish Geoffrey’s Arthurian narrative, by far the most interesting,
and the most important in their influence upon the literary development
of Arthurian story, are Wace and Layamon. Both are poets, and their
metrical _Bruts_ mark, as it were, the transitional stage between
the Arthur of history and traditional legend and the Arthur of pure
romance. Wace, according to Layamon, dedicated his poem, which was
completed in 1155, to “the noble Eleanor, who was the high King
Henry’s queen.”[88] This statement--and there is no reason to doubt
its truth--affords another indication of the interest of the Angevin
court in the literary exploitation of “the matter of Britain.” Geoffrey
had already besought royal approval for his presentment of British
legends, and had done his best to clothe his account of Arthur’s deeds
in the highly-coloured rhetorical trappings that would commend it to
courtly Norman readers. Wace went further. He took Geoffrey’s matter
and dressed it up in a poetical form in French, thus giving it a much
more widespread currency than a Latin prose chronicle could ever have
done. Arthur becomes, in his _Brut_, the flower of chivalry, and
his entire narrative is decorated in a way that would appeal to the
imagination of all knightly Anglo-Normans. Nor is he without thought of
the courtly ladies who took so lively an interest in tales of chivalry.
Like Chrétien de Troyes and other romancers, he is at some pains to
elaborate his descriptions of scenes of love. He takes delight in
dwelling upon the accoutrements of warriors, and upon their individual
exploits in the field. But it is not alone in such embellishments--the
deliberate attempts of a courtly writer to please a courtly circle of
readers--that Wace differs from Geoffrey. He adds to his narrative many
details which indicate that he also had at his command an independent
fund of Arthurian traditions. Wace’s literary celebrity is due,
perhaps, most of all to the fact that he is the first Arthurian writer
to mention the Round Table. “The Bretons,” he says, “tell many a fable
of the Table Round,” but he does not explain whence such fables came,
or where he heard them told.[89] He does, however, inform us that the
Table was made round because each of Arthur’s knights thought himself
better than his fellows, and Arthur devised this method of settling all
disputes about precedence among them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account