Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841Fuller, Margaret
Philosophy
Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841
Fuller, Margaret
Mythology, Classical, in art; Mythology, Greek
R. W. E. explained: “Not in the world, but each on his own platform.”
WILLIAM STORY objected. The life of an individual was not universal. (!)
SOPHIA RIPLEY repeated, “The inner life.”
WILLIAM STORY claimed to be an individual, and did not think individual
experience could ever meet all minds,—like the story of Ceres, for
example.
SOPHIA said all experience was universal.
I said nothing, but held this colloquy with myself. Thought is the best
of human nature; its fulness urges expression: its need of being met, not
only by _one_ other but by every other, _craves_ it. This craving is the
acknowledgment of the universal experience. What is _purely_ individual
is perishable. _Identity_ is to be separated from individuality for this
cause.
MARGARET said the element of beauty would be wanting to our creations. A
fine emotion glowed through features which seem to fall like a soft veil
over the soul, while it could scarce do more than animate those that were
obtuse and coarse in every outline. (!)
“Then,” said WILLIAM STORY, and my heart thanked the _preux
chevalier_,—“then something is wanting in the emotion itself.”
WILLIAM WHITE said, stupidly, that sunlight could not fall with equal
charm on rocks and the green grass. (!)
I asked if the rock could not give what it did not receive? Flung back by
rugged points and relieved by dark shadows, was not the sunlight itself
transfigured?
STORY said every face had its own beauty. No act that was natural could
be ungraceful.
EMERSON said that we all did sundry graceful acts, in our caps and
tunics, which we never could do again, which we never wanted to do again.
MARGARET said, at last we had touched the point. We could not restore
the childhood of the world, but could we not admire this simple plastic
period, and gather from it some notion of the Greek genius?
R. W. E. thought this legitimate. He would have it that we could not
determine the origin of a mythos, but we might fulfil Miss Fuller’s
intention.
MARGARET said history reconciled us to life, by showing that man had
redeemed himself. Genius needed that encouragement.
Not _Genius_, SOPHIA RIPLEY thought; common natures needed it, but Genius
was self-supported.
MARGARET said it might be the consolation of Genius.
MRS. RUSSELL asked why Miss Fuller found so much fault with the present.
MARGARET _had_ no fault to find with it. She took facts as they were.
Every age did something toward fulfilling the cycle of mind. The work of
the Greeks was not ours.
SOPHIA RIPLEY asked if the mythology had been a prophecy of the Greek
mind to itself, or if the nation had experienced life in any wide or deep
sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account