Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841Fuller, Margaret
Philosophy
Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841
Fuller, Margaret
Mythology, Classical, in art; Mythology, Greek
MARGARET liked the reason, and wished she had thought of it herself!
Some one asked about the connection between Diana and Apollo.
MARGARET said that Genius needed a sister to console him.
EMERSON asked what bearing the inscription over the Delphic temple had
upon the story of Apollo,—the Divine pun EI, which means equally “Thou
art” and “If,”—as grand a pun as that of him who, dying, said he was
going to see the great “Perhaps”!—“le grand peut-être.”
Better translated, I thought, as the great “May-be.”
GEORGE RIPLEY asked if it were not generally accepted positively as “Thou
art”?
“Probably,” MR. EMERSON said.
HENRY HEDGE found another type of the Apollo in the Egyptian Horus.
MRS. RUSSELL asked if the two Greek vowels had not once stood for Isis
and Osiris. If so, they would have a natural connection with the oracle.
I remembered the inscription on the statue of Isis, “I am all that has
been and that shall be, and none among mortals has taken off my veil.”
The “I am” of the Jews, and the “Thou art” of the Delphic temple are
epigrammatic, but the same.
EMERSON, replying somewhat curtly to Mrs. Russell, said there were
various explanations.
The story of Phaeton came next.
HENRY HEDGE asked how Presumption should be the child of Genius.
“Genius must be self-confident,” Margaret said, “and that might
predominate.”
I asked if real Genius did not know its own resources and husband them.
MARGARET thought Genius often attempted more than it could do.
I said a man might have genius and presume, but that if _he were a
genius_ I should expect him to be modest. Still, as it must have a crowd
of imitators, it might become the father of presumption. The substance
creates the shadow.
WILLIAM STORY said no product could be as great as the producing power;
but that did not seem to me to touch the point, for the question was not
whether Apollo could not give birth to something less than himself, but
whether the possession of power could create an unfounded claim to it.
The story of Latona followed.
HENRY HEDGE said that the word meant concealment.
MARGARET thought this very expressive, and said that the isolation which
Goethe and other geniuses had been craving since the world began Apollo
had no need to seek. His mother was concealment. The oracle was then
discussed,—how it was possible to consult it many times and receive each
time a different answer,—how it could be bribed, as by Alexander, or
would give two answers in one; but nothing very new was said.
I remembered the double answer of the Pythoness to Crœsus when he
meditated crossing the Halys. “Thou shalt destroy a great empire,” she
said. He thought it was the enemy’s: fate decided it should be his own.
SOPHIA RIPLEY thought the oracle belonged to Wisdom rather than Genius.
MARGARET said Minerva dwelt in men’s houses. It was necessary a voice
from Heaven should speak.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account