Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841Fuller, Margaret
Philosophy
Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841
Fuller, Margaret
Mythology, Classical, in art; Mythology, Greek
Some one wondered that Jupiter had not possessed himself of the oracle,
which led MARGARET back to her exponents, and she confessed that she was
not quite satisfied with her own definition of Jupiter as Will.
EMERSON suggested that experience was a prominent feature in the
Jupiter, and named him Character.
Character is educated Will, said MARGARET, hesitating, and paused, for
the term did not suit her.
Juno was then spoken of as passive Will, and her traits were dwelt upon.
It is amusing to see how weak the Queen of Olympus can be in opposition
to its King. The peacock was probably made sacred to her on account of
the beauty of its plumage, while the eagle was consecrated to Jupiter on
account of its strength.
I said that the peacock, strutting with conceit, glancing at its
ill-shaped feet and vexed enough to bawl in consequence, easily suggested
the scolding Juno.
Some one asked a question about Æsculapius. MARGARET said he was genius
made practical.
HENRY HEDGE thought that Apollo by his own connection with the healing
art became the symbol of physical life and beauty.
WILLIAM STORY thought no statue could bear comparison with the Apollo
Belvedere.
MARGARET preferred the Antinous.
JAMES CLARKE asked why Art should present a so much more inspiring view
of Greek Mythology than Poetry.
MARGARET said that all her ideas of it were deduced from Art. She did
not profess to know much of the Greek authors, and depended chiefly upon
Homer, but wished that some of the gentlemen who ought to know more would
speak.
WILLIAM STORY thought it was because the poets wrote for popular
applause, for recitation and its immediate effect. Sculptors labored more
purely for their Art.
I thought too that the dramatists often had a political aim, and
manœuvred Olympus to suit it!
JAMES CLARKE said that if in our time every public speaker must bend to
his audience to a degree, it was still more necessary in Greece.
We were told to consider Minerva for the next conversation, and to write
down our thoughts about her. For my part I don’t like using Latin names
for Greek deities. It greatly confuses my ideas. Jupiter and Zeus seem
very different to me.
In regard to the story that Apollo never saw a shadow, CAROLINE STURGIS
asked how Apollo could destroy an alien nature if he never met it.
There was quite an unsatisfactory talk about this, which would have ended
had anybody remembered how the sun solves the enigma every day. The
sun never sees the shadow it destroys. When its rays fall, light is. It
annihilates the alien by merely being. So Truth annihilates Falsehood,
yet cannot meet it. The two are never in one presence.
CAROLINE WELLS HEALEY.
March 20, 1841.
IV.
_March 26, 1841._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account