Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841Fuller, Margaret
Philosophy
Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841
Fuller, Margaret
Mythology, Classical, in art; Mythology, Greek
Venus. It tells not only the story of human love, but represents the
pilgrimage of a soul. The jealousy of Venus was that which the good must
always feel toward the better which is to supersede it, and as soon as
Psyche looked upon her sleeping lover she became immortal. The soul in
the fulness of Love became conscious of Destiny.
JAMES CLARKE asked what was the difference between the girl-mother—the
Madonna—and the Greek Venus.
MARGARET replied, with more patience than I was capable of, that the
Madonna represented more than passing womanly beauty. She was prophetic,
and lived again in her child.
Then, persisted JAMES F., why was Vulcan the _husband_ of Beauty, to
which Margaret gave no satisfactory answer. He then gave his own thought,
to which I can do no justice, although it was what I tried in vain to
say at the last conversation. It amounted to this,—that in seeking for
beauty we lose it, but in aiming at utility through hard labor we find
perfect proportion—and consequently perfect beauty. He said that he and
his sister Sarah had often spoken to each other about this, and he felt
that the time would come when essays would be written about our ships,
as we now write essays about the Pyramids and the Greek Art. Posterity
might find the proof of our search after beauty in the graceful prow
and swelling hold and tall, tapering mast or shrouds of shredded jet;
in the bellying canvas and the patron saint which watches the wake from
the stern. But we know that the ship, the most beautiful object in our
modern world, was the product of labor, gradually evoked, according to
the law of fitness, compass, and general proportion. To bring its form
into a natural relation to wind and wave, was to find perfect harmony
and beauty. At first the prow was too sharp, and the water had rushed
over it; the hold was too shallow, and she sat ungracefully where she now
rides as mistress.
EMERSON quoted some German author to the same effect.
MR. CLARKE said there was something in one of R. W. E.’s own Essays which
expressed the same thing.
EMERSON laughed and said, “Very important authority,” and would have
changed the subject, when—
WILLIAM WHITE said that it did not tally well with James Clarke’s theory
that the ugly steamer had succeeded the beautiful clipper.
MR. CLARKE said the theory failed only because there was no noble end in
view. The steamer was not intended to be in harmony with Nature.
EMERSON asked if the Greeks had no symbol for natural beauty. Several
were suggested that he would not accept, but he finally took Diana on
Charles Wheeler’s suggestion.
WHEELER then spoke of the birth of Venus. He said many writers thought
the story as late as that of Psyche, and the line of Hesiod relating to
it an interpolation.
MARGARET thought she should have suspected this if she had never heard
it. The thought it expressed was too comprehensive to be in keeping with
the remainder of her story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account